Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. Only Conclusion I follows
  2. Only Conclusion II follows
  3. Both the Conclusions I and II follow
  4. Neither Conclusion I nor II follows
4 views

1 Answers

Option 2 : Only Conclusion II follows

Since California is the most expensive city, New York would be less expensive than California. So conclusion II follows. But no information is given in the statement regarding the expenses in Texas. So conclusion I does not follow.
4 views

Related Questions

Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. After a Pay Commission bonanza of 2% hike in dearness allowance in March, central government employees and pensioners can expect another round of salary increase with the government set to modify the index and base year for calculating dearness allowance.  II. The labour ministry is working on a new series of consumer price index for industrial workers (CPI-IW), which is used to determine dearness allowance (DA).  Conclusions: I. DA is a cost of living adjustment allowance paid to government employees, public sector employees and pensioners in the country. It is calculated as a percentage of an employee’s basic salary to mitigate the impact of inflation on people.  II. Since theindex is used to determine dearness allowance of all government employees and industrial workers there may be significant financial implication. III. The trend so far is that the weightage of transport, healthcare and housing has gone up many fold in the new series in the monthly expenditure of an industrial worker, especially consumption of petrol and diesel with the addition of cars to it, while there is decline in overall food basket which is being diversified.?
1 Answers 5 Views
One Statement is given followed by two Assumptions, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true, even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Indicate your answer. Statement: Nalluri Venkata Shivaprasad, an ITI qualified person working as Junior Technical Officer (JTO) in the Vijayawada Municipal Corporation (VMC) and with ACB unearthing assets worth Rs. 15.24 crore registered in his name, has become the top-most corrupt officer in 2017 so far. Assumption I: The salary assigned to the post of Junior Technical Officer (JTO) is low. Assumption II: Nalluri Venkata Shivaprasad has no other source of income, didn't win any prize money and didn't acquire assets worth Rs. 15.25 crore through inheritance or gift.?
1 Answers 5 Views