Which statement(s) is/are CORRECT regarding Dalton’s Atomic theory I. All matters are made of very tiny particles. II. Atoms of different elements have different masses and chemical properties. III. The relative number of atoms is variable in any compound.?

Only I and II
Only I and III
Only II and III
All I, II and III

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 1 : Only I and II

• Atomic theory by Dalton proposed that all matter is composed of very tiny particles who he named ‘atoms’ and they consist of non-destructible and indivisible building blocks.

• Dalton's atomic theory also proposed that all atoms of an element are identical in nature and different elements vary in size, mass and chemical properties. So, correct answer is option 1 which says that first and second statements are correct.

4 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

In the question three statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: All Highways are lanes Statement II: Some streets are highways Statement III: All streets are expressways Conclusion I: Some expressways are lanes Conclusion II: Some lanes are streets Conclusion III: Some expressways are highways?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question three statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: All desert is jungle. Statement II: All sand is desert. Statement III: No trees are jungle. Conclusion I: No trees are desert. Conclusion II: No sand is trees. Conclusion III: All jungle is sand.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question three statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: All Gyms are clean. Statement II: Some cities are smart cities. Statement III: All smart cities are clean. Conclusion I: Some cities which are not smart cities are clean is a possibility. Conclusion II: Some smart cities have Gym. Conclusion III: Some cities have Gym.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question three statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: Some injuries are serious. Statement II: No relation is serious. Statement III: All athletes have injuries. Conclusion I: Some athletes are serious. Conclusion II: Some athletes have relation is a possibility. Conclusion III: No athletes is serious.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Starting October, all new cars will have pedestrian safety features, including new design of the bonnet, to reduce impact on pedestrians during accidents. Advanced safety features are needed in all vehicles in India as vehicle safety cannot be confined to luxury vehicles only. Around 1.5 lakh people are killed in road accidents every year in the country, nearly 60% of them are pedestrians. Courses of action: I. The government has set a target to reduce the number of road deaths by half in the next two years. The ministry of road transport and highways has been issuing new safety standards for the automobiles along with eliminating the black spots on national highways. II. By next month, all new cars will have pedestrian safety feature, including new design of the bonnet, to reduce impact on pedestrians during accidents. III. Ministry of road transport and Highways is planning to implement all safety features in vehicles with active support of vehicle manufacturers. Electronic stability control (ESC) and autonomous emergency braking (AEB) will be incorporated in new vehicles by 2022.?

1 Answers 6 Views

The critical reasoning question is based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given. The size of particles is directly linked to their potential for causing health problems. Small particles less than 10 micrometers in diameter cause the greatest problems, as they can get deep into the lungs and some may get into the bloodstream. One being exposed to such particles can affect both the lungs and the heart of a person. But there are particles that are causing environmental effects too, few of which are given below. Which among the following below options does not talk about the effects of these particles on the environment?

1 Answers 4 Views

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments. II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year. III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.?

1 Answers 7 Views

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question three statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: All cotton is cloth. Statement II: All cotton is shirts. Statement III: Some cotton is woven. Conclusion I: Some woven is shirts. Conclusion II: Some cloth is woven. Conclusion III: All cloth is shirts.?

1 Answers 4 Views

A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement. Statement: There goes a saying, “Beauty lies in the eyes of beholder”. Inferences: Blind people do not have any perception of beauty. Different people have different notions of beauty. ?

1 Answers 5 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)