Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. Both I and III 
  2. Both II and III 
  3. Both I and II 
  4. All I, II and III 
6 views

1 Answers

Option 4 : All I, II and III 

  • The Magnetic Lines of Force are imaginary curves that represent a magnetic field graphically. 
  • The characteristics of the magnetic lines of force are as follows:
  1. They are closed curves. Outside the magnet, they are from north to south pole whereas, inside the magnet, it is the other way round. 
  2. If the lines of force are crowded at a place, the field is strong. 
  3. If the lines of force are parallel and equidistant, the concerned magnetic field will be uniform in nature. 
  4. Two magnetic lines of force will never intersect each other. 
6 views

Related Questions

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: Automatic teller machines (ATMs) remain a mainstay of India’s financial inclusion drive and need the central bank’s support to stay relevant amid the government’s push for digital payments. Digital payments haven’t kept pace with the requirement for financial services in far-flung areas and a lack of ATMs there could prove disastrous for the economy.Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. There is still strong demand for cash and if banks do not invest in the ATM infrastructure, especially in rural areas, people might opt to hoard cash instead. II. To maintain a balance between the two modes of payment, there is a need to open up regulatory sandboxes for ATMs to allow manufacturers to collaborate with financial-technology startups. III. Demonetisation pulled out over 85% of the cash in circulation, forcing people to embrace digital payments. Since then, cash in circulation has reverted to its pre-demonetisation days but digital payments have come to stay. ?
1 Answers 5 Views
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Long-term investors may apply for the upcoming IPO of TCNS Clothing. The company’s unique positioning in the less crowded women’s wear segment, with dominant brands such as ‘W’, ‘Aurelia’ and ‘Wishful’, may attract strong interest from institutions. In the choppy markets, funds are increasingly finding more comfort with consumer companies that offer high growth visibility.  Courses of action: I. TCNS manufactures, markets and retails a portfolio of women’s branded apparel across brands ‘W’, ‘Aurelia’ and ‘Wishful’.  II. Besides, with a play on the rising spend by self-earning women, TCNS is likely to command a premium.  III. ‘Aurelia’, which has more contemporary designs, accounts for 33.7 per cent of revenues and has grown at 48 per cent, while ‘Wishful’, a premium occasion wear brand, accounts for 8.6 per cent and has grown at 40 per cent. ?
1 Answers 4 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should government ban child labour Arguments: I. Yes, because they are forced to work against their will. Lots of kids die because they work in dangerous environment. II Yes, because instead of making them work they should be educated as it is their basic right.?
1 Answers 6 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Are artificial sweeteners a good alternative to sugar Arguments: I. Yes, most people consume artificial sweeteners because they want to lose weight as they have very few calories compared to sugar. II. No, because they contain chemicals which may cause headaches and other severe reactions in individuals.?
1 Answers 5 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which argument is strong and which is weak. Statement: Should the release of industrial wastes into water bodies be prohibited Arguments:         I. Yes, because they lead to polluting water that causes some serious human and animal health problems. II. Yes, as they may further lead to global warming.?
1 Answers 4 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement:  The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.?
1 Answers 4 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Since the University of Delhi has a large number of outstation students, should the local students get priority admissions over the outstation students Arguments: Yes. The locals do not want to share their resources with the outsiders. No. The admissions are on the basis of competition and better students deserve to get admissions first irrespective of the place they come from.?
1 Answers 5 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Should the Indian Government withdraw the subsidies on LPG cylinders considering a portion of the population can afford to buy unsubsidised cylinders Arguments: Yes. Subsidising cylinders leads to its misuse. By not giving subsidies on cylinders, the Government can save a part of its income and spend it on other more productive uses. No. Withdrawing subsidies on cylinders would make them too expensive for the poor and the middle class income groups and they would eventually turn to unsustainable means for household uses leading to pollution and ill health.?
1 Answers 5 Views