Consider the following versions of the Android Operating System. I. Ginger Bread II. Jelly Beam III. Cupcake Which among the following would be the correct order of android versions, starting from the left as the oldest one?

II → III → I
I → II → III
III → I → II
None of the above

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 3 : III → I → II

Android is the most popular mobile operating system apart from iOS and Windows.
Cupcake is the oldest version of Android whereas Lollipop is the latest version.
It is developed by Google.

4 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

In the following question, two statements are given followed by two conclusions. Assuming the given statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows the given statements. Statements: I. Some pastry are roll. II. Some jelly are sweet. Conclusions: I. All pastry are sweet. II. All roll being jelly is a possibility.?

1 Answers 7 Views

In the following figure, circle represents pizza, triangle represents burger and rectangle represents bread. Which set of letters represents pizza and burger and not bread?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the following figure Rectangle represent Bread, Circle represent Pizza, triangle represent Burger, and Square represent Cheese. Which set of letter represent cheese and bread.?

1 Answers 4 Views

Consider the following states with respect to the forest cover in India. I. Maharashtra II. Chhattisgarh III. Odisha IV. Arunachal Pradesh Which among the following would be the correct order in which the above states may be arranged according to their forest cover, with the largest forest coverage state starting from the left?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: All pancakes are bread Statement II: Some pizzas are pancakes Conclusion I: No bread are pizzas Conclusion II: Some pizzas are bread?

1 Answers 7 Views

In the question, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: All cakes are pastries Statement II: Some bread are cakes Conclusion I: No pastries are bread Conclusion II: Some bread are pastries?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from the commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: Some pizzas are pancakes. Statement II: All bread are pizzas. Conclusion I: All pancakes are bread. Conclusion II: No bread is a pizza.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All bread are butter. All bread are toast. Conclusions: I. All toast being butter is a possibility. II. All bread being toast is a possibility.?

1 Answers 5 Views

Consider the following countries with respect to the production of castor oil seeds in the world. I. Mozambique II. China III. India Which among the following is the correct sequence of the countries with respect to the production of castor oil seeds, starting from the largest producer from the left?

1 Answers 5 Views

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.?

1 Answers 4 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)