- 1 only
- 2 only
- Both 1 and 2
- Neither 1 nor 2
1 Answers
Option 2 : 2 only
- Assam territory was separated from Bengal in 1874 and it was known as “North-East Frontier” non-regulation province.
- In 1905, It was incorporated into the new province of “Eastern Bengal and Assam”.
- However, in 1912, separate Assam Province was created under British India. It was created by the partition of the “Eastern Bengal and Assam” Province.
- The statehood was granted to Assam in 1950. It is bordered by Bhutan and Arunachal Pradesh to the north and Bangladesh to the south.
- Assam has many wildlife sanctuaries including Kaziranga National Park and Manas Wildlife Sanctuary
6 views
Answered
Related Questions
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing.
Statement: Soon VAT 69 whiskey and Smirnoff Vodka will not be found on the shelves of Delhi Liquor stores owing to the duplication of barcode by manufacturer United Limited. The Delhi government financial commissioner blacklisted the manufacturer. Financial commissioner Anindo Majumdar had said in an order dated September 14, that USL had violated provisions of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009 and Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 by using unauthorized and loose barcodes, which could be easily misused.
Courses of action:
I. The ban will force United Spirits Limited not to sell its liquor in the national capital for two years.
II. the appellant violated provisions of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009, Delhi Excise Rules, 2010, the terms and conditions of the license issued to it and the standard operating procedure framed by the Delhi Excise Department and that consequently the department has rightly imposed the penalty of blacklisting under Rule 70 of the Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 upon United Spirits LTD (USL), Aurangabad.
III. United Limited has been blacklisted by the Delhi government financial commissioner.?
1 Answers
6 Views
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested course of action logically follow (s) for pursuing.
Statement: The Centre on Wednesday approved construction of nearly 6.28 lakh more affordable houses for urban poor in eleven states under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna, with Uttar Pradesh getting the largest share of over 2.34 lakh housing units. In a statement, the Housing and Urban Affairs Ministry said that considering the extraordinary situation due to the recent heavy floods in Kerala, it has decided to release Rs 486.87 crore for first and second instalments together to the state by relaxing norm in the sanctioned projects under PMAY(U).
Courses of action:
I. The government is targeting one crore houses to be constructed in urban areas across the country under under PMAY (U) over a period of seven years from 2015 to 2022.
II. Last month, the committee also sanctioned construction of 1.12 lakh affordable houses for the poor in eight states.
III. With the sanction for the construction of 6,28,488 housing units, the total number of houses being funded under the PMAY (Urban) stands at 60,28,628 across the country so far.?
1 Answers
5 Views