A coastal region with unparalleled beauty is home to many species of animals. It is dotted with coral reefs and unspoiled white sandy beaches. It has remained inaccessible to tourists due to poor connectivity and lack of accommodation. A company has spotted the opportunity and is planning to develop a luxury resort with helicopter service to the nearest major city airport. Environmentalists are upset that this would lead to the region becoming crowded and polluted like any other major beach resorts. Which one of the following statements can be logically inferred from the information given in the above paragraph?

Question

A coastal region with unparalleled beauty is home to many species of animals. It is dotted with coral reefs and unspoiled white sandy beaches. It has remained inaccessible to tourists due to poor connectivity and lack of accommodation. A company has spotted the opportunity and is planning to develop a luxury resort with helicopter service to the nearest major city airport. Environmentalists are upset that this would lead to the region becoming crowded and polluted like any other major beach resorts. Which one of the following statements can be logically inferred from the information given in the above paragraph?

The culture and tradition of the local people will be influenced by the tourists.
The region will become crowded and polluted due to tourism.
The coral reefs are on the decline and could soon vanish.
Helicopter connectivity would lead to an increase in tourists coming to the region.

LohaHridoy

5 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

Related Questions

In the following question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: Some crow are bats. some bats are animals. some animals are humans. Conclusions: I. Some animals are crow. II No animals are crow. III. Some humans are not bats.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the following question below are some statements given followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows\follow the given statements. Statements: All dogs are animals. Some cats are animals. Some cats are rat. No rat is tiger. Conclusions: Some tiger is cat. Some dogs are animals. Some rat are cats.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In each of the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: I. All big are small. II. Some small are tall. III. No tall is white. Conclusions: I. Some big are white. II. Some big are not white. III. Some small are not white.?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the below question, some statements are given. You have to take the given statements true even if they appear to be at variance with commonly known facts, and then decide which of conclusions logically follows from the given statements. For each question, mark out an appropriate answer choice that you think is correct. Statements: All animals are birds. Some birds are dogs. Some dogs are jugs. No jug is bug. Conclusions: 1) Some birds are animals. 2) Some dogs are animals. 3) Some dogs are not bugs. 4) Some dogs are not animals.?

1 Answers 4 Views

City U is 9 km towards the east of City V. City W is 5 km towards the south of City U. City X is 3 km towards the west of City W. City Y is 5 km towards the north of City X. City Z is 7 km towards the south of City X. Which of the cities lie on a straight line?

1 Answers 5 Views

City P is 3 km towards the west of City O. City R is 7 km towards the south of City P. City Q is 7 km is towards the east of City R. City T is 5 km is towards the west of City Q. City S is 4 km is towards the south of City Q. Which of the cities lie on a straight line?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: I. All board are white. II. Some board are new. Conclusions: I. Some white are new. II. All white are new.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested course of action logically follow (s) for pursuing. Statement: Textiles maker Arvind Ltd. is planning to invest Rs. 500 crore per annum for the next 4-5 years with an aim to double revenue from its textile business to Rs. 12,000 crore. The company is in the process of de-merging its brands and engineering businesses into separate entities. Courses of action: I. The company is looking dramatic ramp up in garmenting (making garments from fabrics) from 10 per cent at present to 50 per cent over time. A big chunk of this planned investment will be for garmenting. II. The company will be looking at developing 3 large garment clusters in Jharkhand, Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat. Each of these clusters will employ 4,000-8,000 workers. III. The company is planning to double its textile business from Rs. 6,000 crore to Rs. 12,000 crore in 5 years time. It plans to invest Rs. 500 crore every year for the next five years to expand its textile business.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested course of action logically follow (s) for pursuing. Statement: Walmart has been eyeing Indian markets for years now – and its $16 billion worth majority stake in Flipkart has finally given it the opportunity it was looking for to bring its retail business to India. If Walmart were to build its own e-commerce network in the large and diverse Indian market, it would undoubtedly face many challenges. Since, Walmart isn’t an established e-commerce player, the option of growing by way of acquiring is attractive, allowing Walmart to profit from Flipkart’s presence and build on efficiency and scale in e-commerce. Courses of action: I. Walmart’s leverage will allow the company to globally source cheap resources and sell their products into India at deep discounts. II. To compete with Walmart at competitive prices, sellers will have to operate at the same scale, which will be beyond the reach reach of many. III. Walmart presently has a very small presence in India and Flipkart’s market share while significant, is not deemed large enough to cause concern to competition.?

1 Answers 6 Views

In the following question, a given question is followed by information in two statements. You have to decide the data in which statement (s) is sufficient to answer the question and mark your answer accordingly. Amita, Priya, Sebastian, Trisha, Mauli, Jovita and Angelin have their flights to be departed from different airports such as Mumbai airport, Delhi airport, Chandigarh airport, Bangalore airport, Assam airport, Chennai airport and Amritsar airport. From which airport does Jovita’s flight depart I. Trisha’s flight is from Assam airport. Mauli and Priya do not have their flights from Amritsar. Angelin’s flight is not from Chennai airport. II. Amita’s flight is from Bangalore airport. Jovita’s flight is not from Mumbai airport. Sebastian’s flight is departing from Delhi airport.?

1 Answers 4 Views

AhmedNazir · Accepted Answer · 2022-09-04T04:29:57+06:00

Option 4 : Helicopter connectivity would lead to an increase in tourists coming to the region.

Options 1, 2, and 3 are incorrect as they are assumptions.

Only option 4 which says 'Helicopter connectivity would lead to an increase in tourists coming to the region.' can be logically inferred from the passage. This is because the passage mentions in the beginning that the coastal region has remained 'inaccessible to tourists due to poor connectivity' which would not be the case once a 'helicopter service to the nearest major city airport' is established.

Hence option 4 is the correct answer.