A part of the sentence may or may not have an error. Find out which part has an error and mark that part as your answer. If there are no errors, mark 'No error' as your answer. Nirav Modi’s legal team on May 12 told a U.K. court hearing the fugitive diamond merchant’s five-day / (A) extradition trial that the case of fraud and money laundering at him is / (B) not backed up with the underlying evidence that proves his dishonesty. / (C) No error / (D)?

Option 2 : B

The correct answer is option 2 i.e. B

The given sentence is erroneous because of the wrong usage of ‘preposition at’ in part B of the sentence.

The preposition ‘at’ is used to indicate the directions/exact location or place of something or someone/also used to denote times/often used to indicate the age of someone etc

but in case of opposing or disagreeing with someone or something as given in part B of the sentence, the case of fraud and money laundering is something which is against Nirav Modi.

Therefore, we will use ‘against’ in place of ‘at’

The correct sentence-‘ Nirav Modi’s legal team on May 12 told a U.K. court hearing the fugitive diamond merchant’s five-day  extradition trial that the case of fraud and money laundering against him  is not backed up with the underlying evidence that proves his dishonesty.’