In the question below is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement: Statements: In one day match of India vs Australia, the total wickets taken by Indian team was 8. Out of those 4 were taken by Indian batsmen. Conclusions: I. Last over was bowled by batsman. II. 30% team consists of batsmen. ?

Only conclusion I follows
Only conclusion II follows
Either I or II follows
Neither I nor II follows

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 4 : Neither I nor II follows

Statements: In one day match of India vs Australia, the total wickets taken by Indian team was 8. Out of those 4 were taken by Indian batsmen.

Conclusions:

I. Last over was bowled by batsman → False

Since, there is nothing mentioned about last over.

II. 30% team consists of batsmen → False

As, nothing is mentioned about number of bowlers and batsmen.

Hence, neither conclusion I nor II follows.

4 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

In the question below there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement: Statements: The Indian locomotive class WAG-12 is a class of 25 kV AC electric locomotives that was developed in 2017 by Alstom for the Indian Railways. Conclusions: I. The load capacity of WAG-12 is 6000 tons. II. WAG-12 uses an AC voltage system. ?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement: Statements: Covid-19 pandemic affected the population of old people as most of them have low immunity. Conclusions: I. All old people have low immunity. II. The population of old people is decreased by 20%. ?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below, a statement is followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement: Statements: “India was the only smartphone market in the top three to witness growth as both China and the US markets declined year-over-year in Q3 2020(July-September 2020). A record 54.3 million units were shipped during the quarter with 17 per cent y-o-y growth in the crucial third quarter of the year,” IDC said. Conclusions: I. More than 54.3 million units will be shipped in Q4. II. US shipped less than 54. 3 million units in Q3. ?

1 Answers 5 Views

In the question below is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement: Statements: The US recorded nearly 115000 new coronavirus cases in a single day for the first time on Monday, with some states and cities implementing tougher restrictions to curb the spread. There will be a lockdown for a week in New York. Conclusions: I. Only 115000 new coronavirus cases are present in US on Monday. II. New York would be in lockdown for 7 days. ?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement: Statements: On Saturday, April 2nd, India won the 2011 Cricket World Cup, defending Sri Lanka by 6 wickets in final, played at the Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai, India. Conclusions: I. India scored chased 278 runs in finals. II. M. S. Dhoni was the captain of Indian Cricket team in 2011 Cricket World Cup.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement: Statements: In major win for government’s Aatamnirbhar India initiative, Apple has started manufacturing of one of its flagship devices, the iPhone 11, at Chennai’s Foxconn plant. This is the first time Apple has manufactured a top of the line model in India. Conclusions: I. All iPhone 11 devices are manufactured only in India. II. Only Foxconn company manufacture iPhone. ?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement: Statements: Only disciplined persons value time and do their work on time. Harsh complete his tasks on time and play football in his spare time. Conclusions: I. Harsh is a disciplined person. II. Harsh is a team member of India’s football team. ?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement: Statements: India’s health policy states that there should be 200 beds per thousand population of a city but in Mumbai there are 150 beds per thousand population. Conclusions: I. Mumbai’s health system is not taking health policy of India seriously. II. The funds for the health policy is not adequate.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below, is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer: (A) If only conclusion I follows (B) If only conclusion II follows (C) If either I or II follows (D) If both I and II follow. STATEMENT: LED bulbs are preferred over incandescent bulbs. CONCLUSION 1: They provide more brightness. CONCLUSION 2: They are more eco-friendly.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question below, is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer: (A) If only conclusion I follows (B) If only conclusion II follows (C) If either I or II follows (D) If both I and II follow. STATEMENT: Sun consists of huge amount of Helium. Sun is a typical midsize star. CONCLUSION 1: Most midsize stars will have at least some Helium. CONCLUSION 2: Large stars have more helium as compared to smaller stars.?

1 Answers 6 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)