Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. Both conclusions I and II follow
  2. Only conclusion II follows
  3. Only conclusion I follows
  4. Neither conclusion I nor II follows
5 views

1 Answers

Option 1 : Both conclusions I and II follow

The candidates who are yet to graduate are those who have appeared for the final year of graduation.

As per the given information, these candidates are considered eligible and hence can be considered for selection as the first statement says the possibility of some candidates in the selection list.

Therefore, the conclusion I follow.

The minimum required qualification is graduation. Therefore, those who have at least completed their graduation are eligible for the job.  and can be in the selection list.

Therefore, conclusion II follows.

Hence, both conclusions I and II follow.

5 views

Related Questions

The following are the criteria set by a Retail outlet for the selection of candidates for the post of Store In charge in a reputed mall. 1. The candidate must be a graduate in any stream with minimum of 50% marks. 2. The candidate must have Minimum of 5 years of Sales experience in Retail. 3. The age of the candidate should not be less than 25 years and more than 34 years as on 1st October, 2019. (a) If a candidate satisfies all the criteria except 2 as given above but has an MBA degree and has minimum of 2 years of work experience in sales, she/he must be sent to the General Manager, Recruitment for further interview. (b) If a candidate satisfies all the criteria except 3, but has more than 5 years experience as a Group Manager and above in Sales managing a team of sales executives, then she/he must be sent to the Regional Manager, Sales & Marketing, for further interview Based on the above criteria and conditions, analyze and decide which of the following course of action should be taken for the candidate whose description is provided below. Please note that you are not to assume anything other than the given information. Sujoy is a graduate with 55% marks and MBA through Correspondence. He was born on Sept 20, 1990. He has 1 year of work experience as a sales executive and 2 years of experience as a Group Manager, Sales. On the basis of the information as given above, which of the following decisions would be appropriate?
1 Answers 6 Views
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should minimum deposits be banned to open an account in a bank Arguments: I. Yes, because people who aren’t making enough money can also open a bank account to save their earnings. II. No, because bank has to pay overhead to run branches, maintain accounts and more thus requires minimum deposits.?
1 Answers 6 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: As part of an effort to address the rising cases of divorces in the country, China's Jiangsu province has introduced a voluntary 'divorce test' for couples planning to end their marriage. Couples who score above 60 may be able to save their marriage, the civil affairs bureau said. Around 34 lakh Chinese couples filed for divorce in 2017. Is this sort of a decision/ test legitimate Arguments: I. Yes, it is a valid decision and will give couples a chance to save their relationship. II. No, if a couple has decided to end their relationship, such a test won’t be beneficial. III. Yes, there is no harm in giving the test, if they want to separate their ways they can. But there might be a ray of hope that they decide to rethink their decision.?
1 Answers 4 Views
In each question below is given a statement numbered I, II and III. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the following assumption and decide which of the assumption is implicit in the statement. Statement: About a year ago, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had told the world that the signature of a chartered accountant on financial statements was, perhaps, more powerful than even one of his own. ‘Just like doctors don’t want people to be ill to get more business, chartered accountants, too, need to safeguard the society’s economic health. Your signature is more powerful than the PM’s, and the government also believes the accounts signed by you’, Modi had said.  Assumptions: I. The CA community, however, may not have woken up to the value of the initials they put on financial statements. Last year has been more of a challenge for the community’s reputation, with banking frauds, asset quality divergences and mid-term auditor resignations dominating the headlines.  II. There cannot be a situation where there will be 100% agreement on everything. You may have rules but still judgmental factors in credit, asset recognition come in. The approach is that as soon as the asset is stretched, banks have to recognise the problem.  III. But even basic logic just went out of the window and banks together kept dishing out loans to such companies even when their annual turnover was half of the total debt.?
1 Answers 5 Views