- He should impart right information about sex
- He should redirect the energies of the adolescent to fruitful channels through sports and other constructive activities
- He should have unsympathetic attitude towards others
- He should have right information about sex
1 Answers
Call
Talk Doctor Online in Bissoy App
Rohit was walking on the street, one boy requested him to donate for cancer patients welfare fund. He gave him a rupee more than half the money he had. He walked a few more steps. Then came a girl who requested him to donate for poor people's fund for which he gave two rupees more than half the money he had then. After that, again a boy approached him for an orphanage fund. He gave three rupees more than half of what he had. At last he had just one rupee remaining in his hand. How much amount did Ram have in his pocket when he started?
Answer: Option 3 Let X be the rupees he initially had. He gave for the cancer fund one rupee more than half of what he had. i.e.,[1 +(X/2)]. Remaining money = X-(1+X/2) =...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should all the practising doctors be brought under Government control so that they get salary from the Government and treat patients free of cost Arguments : I. No. How can any country do such an undemocratic thing II. Yes. Despite many problems, it will certainly help minimize, if not eradicate, unethical medical practices.?
Answer: Option 2 A doctor treating a patient individually can mislead the patient into wrong and unnecessary treatment for his personal gain. So, argument II holds strong. Also, a...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly Arguments : I. Yes. It is a rule and rules should be followed strictly by all. II. No. Each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion. III. No. It does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not. IV. Yes. It is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by the helmet.?
Answer: Option 3 Clearly, the rule has been devised for the safety of two-wheeler riders, as majority of two wheeler accidents result in direct fall of the rider, leading to...
1 Answers 1 views
Find out whether there is any grammatical error in below sentence. On his attitude / it seems that what he wants / is that the decision-making power / should rest with him.?
Answer: Option 1 From his attitude
1 Answers 2 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be reservation of jobs in the organizations in the private sector also as in the public sector undertakings in India Arguments : I. Yes. This would give more opportunities of development to the weaker sections of the society and thus help reduce the gap between the affluent and the downtrodden in India. II. No. The private sector does not get any government assistance and therefore they should not be saddled with such policies. III. No. Nowhere else in the world such a practice is being followed. IV. No. The management of the private sector undertaking would not agree to such compulsions.?
Answer: Option 1 The reservation of jobs in the private sector too would surely increase opportunities for weaker sections to improve their economic plight. Thus, argument I is strong enough....
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the income generated out of agricultural activities be taxed Arguments : I. No. Farmers are otherwise suffering from natural calamities and low yield coupled with low procurement price and their income should not be taxed. II. Yes. Majority of the population is dependent on agriculture and hence their income should be taxed to augment the resources. III. Yes. Many big farmers earn much more than the majority of the service earners and they should be taxed to remove the disparity.?
Answer: Option 3 Clearly, if the income of farmers is not adequate, they cannot be brought under the net of taxation as per rules governing the Income Tax Act. So,...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should all the students graduating in any discipline desirous of pursuing post-graduation of the subjects of their choice be allowed to enrol in the post-graduate courses Arguments : I. Yes. The students are the best judge of their capabilities and there should not be restrictions for joining post-graduate courses. II. No. The students need to study relevant subjects in graduate courses to enrol in post-graduate courses and the students must fulfil such conditions. III. No. There are not enough institutes offering post-graduate courses which can accommodate all the graduates desirous of seeking post-graduate education of their own choice.?
Answer: Option 5 Only argument II is strong. The students cannot be enrolled in the courses just on the basis of their interests, but their compatibility with the same also...
1 Answers 2 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should mercy death be legalized, i.e., all those who are suffering from terminal diseases be allowed to end their lives if they so desire Arguments : I. No. Nobody should be allowed to end his/her life at his/her will as this goes against the basic tenets of humanity. II. Yes. Patients undergoing terrible suffering and having absolutely no chance of recovery should be liberated from suffering through mercy death. III. No. Even mercy death is a sort of killing and killing can never be legalized.?
Answer: Option 5 Clearly, mercy death will serve as a liberation to those to whom living is more difficult and painful. But then, it is an inhuman act and does...
1 Answers 1 views
Direction : Two statements I and II are given. These statement may be either independent causes or may be effects of independent causes or a common cause. One of these statements may be the effect of the other statements. Read both the statements and decide which of the following answer choice correctly depicts the relationship between these two statements. Mark answer : I. Rural and semi-urban areas in the country have been suffering due to load shedding for quite some time. II. If the Government is not able to overcome the power crisis, load shedding will be extended even to the urban areas.?
Answer: Option 3 The facts given in statements are clearly the result of acute power shortage. So, both the satements I and II are independent causes.
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer : Statements : Players who break various records in a fair way get special prizes. Player X broke the world record but was found to be under the influence of a prohibited drug. Conclusions : I. X will get the special prize. II. X will not get the special prize.?
Answer: Option 2 Clearly, X will not get the special prize because although he broke the world record, he was found to use unfair means. So, II follows while I...
1 Answers 1 views