1 Answers
Call
Talk Doctor Online in Bissoy App
Sunil entered a shopping center and spent one half of the money that he had. When he finished his purchase he found that he had as many paise as he had rupees and half as many rupees as he had paise when he went. How much money did he have when he entered?
Answer: Option 3 Here we have to verify the given two conditions for the given options. Condition :1 As given, after finished his purchase he had the rupees as much as the...
1 Answers 1 views
Rohit was walking on the street, one boy requested him to donate for cancer patients welfare fund. He gave him a rupee more than half the money he had. He walked a few more steps. Then came a girl who requested him to donate for poor people's fund for which he gave two rupees more than half the money he had then. After that, again a boy approached him for an orphanage fund. He gave three rupees more than half of what he had. At last he had just one rupee remaining in his hand. How much amount did Ram have in his pocket when he started?
Answer: Option 3 Let X be the rupees he initially had. He gave for the cancer fund one rupee more than half of what he had. i.e.,[1 +(X/2)]. Remaining money = X-(1+X/2) =...
1 Answers 1 views
I was P : and stay for few days in Delhi Q : when my father told me R : very excited S : that I could go with him The Proper sequence should be:?
Answer: Option 2 I was very excited when my father told me that I could go with him and stay for few days in Delhi.
1 Answers 1 views
I was P : and stay for a few days in Delhi Q : when my father told me R : very excited S : that I could go with him The Proper sequence should be:?
Answer: Option 3 I was very excited when my father told me that I could go with him and stay for a few days in Delhi.
1 Answers 1 views
The world P : although it sometimes seems that way Q : is not a total chaos R : the newspaper headlines S : when we read The Proper sequence should be:?
Answer: Option 2 The world is not a total chaos although it sometimes seems that way when we read the newspaper headlines.
1 Answers 2 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly Arguments : I. Yes. It is a rule and rules should be followed strictly by all. II. No. Each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion. III. No. It does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not. IV. Yes. It is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by the helmet.?
Answer: Option 3 Clearly, the rule has been devised for the safety of two-wheeler riders, as majority of two wheeler accidents result in direct fall of the rider, leading to...
1 Answers 1 views
This time P : exactly what he had been told Q : the young man did R : beyond his dreams S : and the plan succeeded The Proper sequence should be:?
Answer: Option 2 This time the young man did exactly what h had been told and the plan succeeded beyond his dreams.
1 Answers 1 views
A French woman P : committed suicide Q : where she had put up R : who had come to Calcutta S : by jumping from the first floor balcony of the hotel The Proper sequence should be:?
Answer: Option 3 A French woman who had come to Calcutta committed suicide by jumping from the first floor balcony of the hotel where she had put up.
1 Answers 1 views
We went P : along the railway line Q : and had a right to R : where other people not allowed to go S : but daddy belonged to the railway The Proper sequence should be:?
Answer: Option 2 We went along the railway line where other people not allowed to go but daddy belonged to the railway and had a right to.
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should mercy death be legalized, i.e., all those who are suffering from terminal diseases be allowed to end their lives if they so desire Arguments : I. No. Nobody should be allowed to end his/her life at his/her will as this goes against the basic tenets of humanity. II. Yes. Patients undergoing terrible suffering and having absolutely no chance of recovery should be liberated from suffering through mercy death. III. No. Even mercy death is a sort of killing and killing can never be legalized.?
Answer: Option 5 Clearly, mercy death will serve as a liberation to those to whom living is more difficult and painful. But then, it is an inhuman act and does...
1 Answers 1 views