- Only I and II follow
- Only II and III follow
- Only I and III follow
- All follow
- None of these
Answer: Option 3 The problem discussed in the statement is not regarding the current accident, but to do something to avert such mishaps. Accidents at railway crossings can be averted...
1 Answers 1 viewsAnswer: Option 1 From I, we can conclude that the Chairman visited Purchase department on Monday of the first week of September. The time of visit of no department is mentioned...
1 Answers 1 viewsAnswer: Option 1 Clearly, incidents of robbery can be practically averted only by tightening security arrangements and increasing vigilance by police. So, I follows. Neither II nor III follows as...
1 Answers 1 viewsAnswer: Option 1 The step discussed in the statement would surely give a boost to hardware industry and help our country to stand apart in this field. Thus, only I...
1 Answers 2 viewsAnswer: Option 4 Clearly, the owner of the shop should be punished for selling spurious liquor. Further, attempts should be made to unearth other such unscrupulous liquor sellers by conducting...
1 Answers 2 viewsAnswer: Option 5 Only argument II is strong. The students cannot be enrolled in the courses just on the basis of their interests, but their compatibility with the same also...
1 Answers 2 viewsAnswer: Option 4 The issue is not so big as to be made public extensively. So, I does not follow. Besides, the authorities must be prepared to deal with the...
1 Answers 1 viewsAnswer: Option 4 Keeping in mind the safety and convenience of passengers, both I and II follow. III clearly suggests a remedy to the problem and hence it also follows.
1 Answers 1 viewsAnswer: Option 2 The reduction in procurement price of crops must have instigated the farmers not to sell their produce to Government agencies.
1 Answers 1 viewsAnswer: Option 4 Both the statements I and II are effects of independent causes.
1 Answers 1 views