- Only I follows
- Only II follows
- Either I or II follows
- Neither I nor II follows
- Both I and II follow
Answer: Option 5 Both the arguments are strong because by doing so, students will get more opportunities and it is also correct that without any affiliation the quality of training...
1 Answers 2 viewsAnswer: Option 2 Clearly, after being in strict discipline and following a formal dress code of the school for so many years, the students must be granted some liberty in...
1 Answers 1 viewsAnswer: Option 2 For the all-round progress of the nation, all the students, especially the talented and intelligent ones, must avail of higher education, even if the government has to...
1 Answers 1 viewsAnswer: Option 5 Only argument II is strong. The students cannot be enrolled in the courses just on the basis of their interests, but their compatibility with the same also...
1 Answers 2 viewsAnswer: Option 4 Clearly, a policy to select deserving candidates cannot be abolished just because of the expenditure it entails. So, argument I does not hold. Also, students who are...
1 Answers 1 viewsAnswer: Option 2 The emphasis should be not on the Government putting all the engineering graduates to jobs but on the colleges producing not 'degree-holders' but real technical minds which...
1 Answers 4 viewsAnswer: Option 2 The parents' protest against high fees being charged by the institutions led the government to interfere and fix the fees at a more affordable level.
1 Answers 2 viewsAnswer: Option 5 Both the statements are effects of some common cause.
1 Answers 2 viewsAnswer: Option 2 Since the parents of aspiring students seeking admission to professional courses had launched a severe agitation protesting against the high fess changed by the professional institutes. So, the...
1 Answers 4 viewsAnswer: Option 2 After being in strict discipline and following a formal dress code of the school for so many years, the students must be granted some liberty in college...
1 Answers 1 views