Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should system of offering jobs only to the wards of government employees be introduced in all government offices in India Arguments : I. No. It denies opportunity to many deserving individuals and government may stand to lose in the long run. II. No. It is against the principle of equality, does not government owe its responsibility to all its citizens?

LohaHridoy
  1. Only argument I is strong
  2. Only argument II is strong
  3. Either I or II is strong
  4. Neither I nor II is strong
  5. Both I and II are strong

0 like 0 dislike
1 views
Share with your friends

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Call

Answer: Option 5

Merit, fair selection and equal opportunities for all - these three factors, if taken care of, can help government recruit competent officials and also fulfil the objectives of the Constitution. Thus, both the arguments hold strong.

0 like 0 dislike
1 views
Talk Doctor Online in Bissoy App
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should Government close down loss making public sector enterprise Arguments : I. No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do. II. Yes, in a competitive world the rule is survival is of the fittest.?

Answer: Option 1 Closing, down public-sector enterprise ill definitely throw the engaged person out of employment. So, argument I hold strong. also, closing down is no solution for a loss-...

1 Answers 2 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises Arguments : I. No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do II. Yes. In a competitive world the rule is 'survival of the fittest'.?

Answer: Option 1 Closing down public-sector enterprises will definitely throw the engaged persons out of employment. So, argument I holds. Also, closing down is no solution for a loss-making enterprise....

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should number of holidays of government employees be reduced Arguments : I. Yes, our government employees are having maximum number of holidays among the other countries of the world. II. Yes, it will lead to increased productivity of government offices.?

Answer: Option 2 Argument I is not strong because we should not copy other country. But II is strong because on reducing the number of holidays, the working time will...

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should articles of only deserving authors be allowed to be published Arguments : I. Yes. It will save a lot of paper which is in short supply. II. No. It is not possible to draw a line between the deserving and the undeserving.?

Answer: Option 2 Clearly, I does not provide a strong reason in support of the statement. Also, it is not possible to analyze the really deserving and not deserving. So/argument...

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the practice of transfers of clerical cadre employees from government offices of one city to those of another be stopped Arguments : I. No. Transfer of employees is a routine administrative matter and we must continue it. II. Yes. It involves lot of governmental expenditure and inconvenience too many compared to the benefits it yields.?

Answer: Option 4 It is not necessary that any practice which has been in vogue for a long time is right and it must be continued. So, argument I is...

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be reservation in Government jobs for candidates from single child family Arguments : I. No. This is not advisable as the jobs should be offered to only deserving candidates without any reservation for a particular group. II. Yes. This will help reduce the growing population in India as the parents will be encouraged to adopt single child norm.? 1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should individuals/institutes having treasures of national significance like Nobel Prizes, hand them over to the Central Government for their safe custody Arguments : I. Yes. The individuals or institutions do not have enough resources to protect them. II. No. These are the property of the individuals/institutions who win them and should be in their custody.?

Answer: Option 2 Clearly, the awards are given for individual excellence and perfection. So, only argument II holds strong.

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should all the management institutes in the country be brought under government control Arguments : I. No. The government does not have adequate resources to run such institutes effectively. II. No. Each institute should be given freedom to function on its own. III. Yes. This will enable to have standardized education for all the students. IV. Yes. Only then the quality of education would be improved.?

Answer: Option 1 Clearly, the government can pool up resources to run such institutes, if that can benefit the citizens. So, I does not hold strong. II does not provide...

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the number of holidays of government employees be reduced Arguments : I. Yes. Our government employees are having the maximum number of holidays among the countries of the world. II. Yes. It is a sign of British legacy, why should we carry it further III. Yes. It will speed up work and all the pending jobs can be completed well in time. IV. No. Employees must be given ample spare time to spend with their family.?

Answer: Option 2 Reducing the number of holidays just because no other country gives so many holidays or it is a feature of a certain system which we have renounced,...

1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should seniority be the only criterion for the promotion Arguments : I. No. It would be an injustice to those juniors who are more deserving and suitable for higher positions than their senior counterparts. II. Yes. Otherwise senior employees do feel humiliated. III. Yes. Senior employees are more experienced and must be rewarded for the same.?

Answer: Option 2 In an organization, what matters most is productivity and to ensure productivity, the organization needs to have effective managers and innovative, devoted and hard-working employees. Thus, the...

1 Answers 1 views
X