- Only argument I is strong
- Only argument II is strong
- Either I or II is strong
- Neither I nor II is strong
- Both I and II are strong
1 Answers
Call
Answer: Option 2
Income-tax is levied so that every citizen can contribute a share of his earning towards the infrastructural development of the nation. So, argument I seems to be vague. However, income-tax is no doubt a good source of revenue for the government. Hence, argument II holds strong.
0
like
0 dislike
Talk Doctor Online in Bissoy App
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly Arguments : I. Yes. It is a rule and rules should be followed strictly by all. II. No. Each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion. III. No. It does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not. IV. Yes. It is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by the helmet.?
Answer: Option 3 Clearly, the rule has been devised for the safety of two-wheeler riders, as majority of two wheeler accidents result in direct fall of the rider, leading to...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should young entrepreneurs be encouraged Arguments : I. Yes. They will help in industrial development of the country. II. Yes. They will reduce the burden on employment market.?
Answer: Option 5 Clearly, encouraging the young entrepreneurs will open up the field for the establishment of new industries. Thus, it shall help in industrial development and not only employ...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should all the annual examinations up to Std. V be abolished Arguments : I. Yes. The young students should not be burdened with such examinations which hampers their natural growth. II. No. The students will not study seriously as they will get automatic promotion to the next class and this will affect them in future.?
Answer: Option 5 Clearly, neither the students can be burdened with studies at such a tender age, nor can they be left free to take studies casually, as this shall...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be a maximum limit for the number of ministers in the Central Government Arguments : I. No. The political party in power should have the freedom to decide the number of ministers to be appointed. II. Yes. The number of ministers should be restricted to a certain percentage of the total number of seats in the parliament to avoid unnecessary expenditure.?
Answer: Option 2 Clearly, there should be some norms regarding the number of ministers in the Government, as more number of ministers would unnecessarily add to the Government expenditure. So,...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should school education be made free in India Arguments : I. Yes. This is the only way to improve the level of literacy. II. No. It would add to the already heavy burden on the exchequer.?
Answer: Option 2 Making education free for all is not the only means to ensure literacy. An awareness needs to be aroused for this. So, argument I is vague. Also,...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should octroi be abolished Arguments : I. Yes. It will eliminate an important source of corruption. II. No. It will adversely affect government revenues.?
Answer: Option 5 'Octroi' is a custom duty. If octroi is abolished, the practice of bringing in things from foreign countries illegally will be abolished. So, argument I holds strong....
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the income generated out of agricultural activities be taxed Arguments : I. No. Farmers are otherwise suffering from natural calamities and low yield coupled with low procurement price and their income should not be taxed. II. Yes. Majority of the population is dependent on agriculture and hence their income should be taxed to augment the resources. III. Yes. Many big farmers earn much more than the majority of the service earners and they should be taxed to remove the disparity.?
Answer: Option 3 Clearly, if the income of farmers is not adequate, they cannot be brought under the net of taxation as per rules governing the Income Tax Act. So,...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by four arguments I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should all the management institutes in the country be brought under government control Arguments : I. No. The government does not have adequate resources to run such institutes effectively. II. No. Each institute should be given freedom to function on its own. III. Yes. This will enable to have standardized education for all the students. IV. Yes. Only then the quality of education would be improved.?
Answer: Option 1 Clearly, the government can pool up resources to run such institutes, if that can benefit the citizens. So, I does not hold strong. II does not provide...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the system of Lok Adalats and mobile courts be encouraged in India Arguments : I. Yes. It helps to grant speedy justice to the masses. II. Yes. The dispensing of minor cases at this level would reduce the burden on the higher courts. III. No. These courts are usually partial in justice.?
Answer: Option 1 Courts are meant to judge impartially. So, argument III is vague. The system of local courts shall speed up justice by providing easy approach and simplified procedures,...
1 Answers 1 views
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should all the indirect taxes in India be combined into a single tax on all commodities Arguments : I. Yes. This will considerably simplify the tax collection mechanism and the cost of collecting tax will also reduce. II. Yes. The manufacturers and traders will be benefited by this which in turn will boost tax collection. III. No. No other country has adopted such system.?
Answer: Option 5 Only I and II are strong. Clearly, both I and II hold strong, as they provide very convincing reasons, for a single tax system would help get...
1 Answers 1 views