Related Questions

The jury returned a not-guilty verdict, ‘defying’ the judge's orders for a conviction.
Following the Supreme Court verdict allowing entry of women in Sabarimala Temple, the Kerala government will reserve 25% seats in buses and make separate toilets for women pilgrims. The existing bathing Ghats for women will be expanded to accommodate more pilgrims. What can be inferred from the above statement? I: The Supreme Court verdict has banned the entry of women in Sabarimala Temple. II: Honoring the Supreme Court verdict, the Kerala government will reserve 25% seats in buses and make separate toilets for women pilgrims. III: The Kerala government will build new ghats to accommodate more pilgrims.
The jury returned a not-guilty verdidt, →defving the judge’s orders for a conviction.
Given below are two premises a) and b). Four conclusions are drawn from them. Select the code that states validly drawn conclusion(s). [Taking the premises individually or jointly] Premises: a) All judges are lawyers. b) No doctors are lawyers. Conclusions: i) No lawyers are doctors. ii) No doctors are judges. iii) All lawyers are judges. iv) Some doctors are judges.
Among the following statements, two are contradictory to each other. Select the code that represents them: Statements: (a) All judges are lawyers. (b) Some judges are lawyers. (c) Some judges are not lawyers. (d) No judges are lawyers.
Consider the following statements: 1. The motion to impeach a Judge of the Supreme Court of India cannot be rejected by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha as per the judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968. 2. The Constitution of India defines and gives details of what constitutes 'incapacity and proved misbehaviour' of the Judges of the Supreme Court of India 3. The details of the process of impeachment of the Judges of the Supreme Court of India are given in the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968. 4. If the motion for the impeachment of a Judge is taken up for voting, the law requires the motion to be backed by each House of the Parliament and supported by a majority of total membership of that House and by not less than two-thirds of total members of that House present and voting. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Two statements are given followed by two conclusions I, II, III and IV. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem at variance from commonly known facts. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follow/s from the given statement. Statements: 1. All judges are lawyers. 2. Some lawyers are seniors. Conclusions: I. Some seniors are judges. II. Some seniors are lawyers. III. Some lawyers are judges. IV. Some judges are seniors. 
A transporter receives the same number of orders each day. Currently, he has some pending orders (backlog) to be shipped. If he uses 7 trucks, then at the end of the 4th day he can clear all the orders. Alternatively, if he uses only 3 trucks, then all the orders are cleared at the end of the 10th day. What is the minimum number of trucks required so that there will be no pending order at the end of the 5th day?
The verdict on the Hyderabad twin blasts (Gokul Chat and Lumbini Park) case was announced by the court in August 2018. How many years later the verdict was delivered.
The judge insisted that the jury ---- a verdict immediately.