Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Rearrange the following sentences in their correct order to form a meaningful paragraph. P. The crane felt insulted and wanted to take revenge. Q. He invited the fox to dine with him, and served boiled rice in a jug which he could not eat. R. A fox and crane were friends. S. The crane had a long beak, so could not take the soup, but the fox licked the dish. T. One day, the fox invited the crane to dinner, and put the soup in a flat dish. Which of the following should be the FIRST sentence after rearrangement?
In the following question, three statements are given. You have to find which is/are necessary and sufficient to answer the following question. Find the ratio of speeds of the lion, dog, and fox. Statement I∶ For every 10 jumps of the lion, the dog takes 7 jumps and the fox takes 12 jumps. Statement II∶ The lion, the dog, and the fox cover distances of 4 m, 12 m, and 3 m respectively in one jump. Statement III∶ The distance covered by the dog in 5 jumps, the distance covered by the lion in 15 jumps, and the distance covered by the fox in 20 jumps are equal.
A fox takes 8 steps for every 4 steps of a bear cub, and 4 steps of fox are equal to 9 steps of the cub. What is the ratio of the speed of fox to that of cub?
In the question below are given two statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some tigers are lions. No lion is fox. Conclusions: I. Some tigers are fox. II. Some fox are lion. III. All tigers are lion.
Directin: In the question below are given some statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All cats are tiger. No tiger is fox. Some cats are white. Conclusions: I. Some cats are fox. II. Some tigers are white. III. Some white are fox.
Shambavi is using ‘Discussion method’ in the teaching of social science class. The topic she is teaching in the class is ‘Gender Discrimination’. On which of the following key points she can ask students to collect information by giving them reasonably good time?  I. Gender discrimination in the historic times II. Gender discrimination at home, in school, in the society III. Ways of overcoming gender discrimination 
What is the feminine gender of fox?
What is the feminine gender of 'Fox.
Feminine gender of fox is
The following sentences form a paragraph. The first and the last sentences of the paragraph are given. The rest of the sentences are numbered as P, Q, R and S. These four parts are not given in their proper order. Read the sentences and choose the alternative that arranges them in the correct order. 1. Sexual favouritism and gender partiality/discrimination are often similarly perceived. P. At the workplace, when romance involves sexual favouritism, it is important to comprehend the cause and extent of the presence of such favouritism i.e. whether this favouritism can give way to other employees (who are not directly involved in the illicit relationship) for claiming themselves as the victims of sexual harassment. Q. However, many critics have befittingly differentiated the two. R. This concludes that sexual favouritism and gender partiality bear both direct and indirect implications for employees.  S. They delineate that sexual favouritism entangles the discerning grant of a gain or opportunity at the workplace; in contrast, sexual partiality/discrimination usually involves the restraining of benefits or opportunities dependent upon an individual's gender. 6. Whether favouritism on the basis of sex remains a legitimate shape of discrimination, or whether sexual favouritism stretches to the extent of a restricted form of sexual partiality, is an important question which can only be answered through comprehending the definition of sexual harassment.