Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

From where are the defensive toxins used by poison dart frogs derived?
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some insects are animals. Some animals are frogs. All frogs are cats. Conclusions: I. Some cats are frogs. II. Some frogs are animals. III. Some animals are insects.
Salary of P is Rs. 30000 and out of that his savings is 20% and rest is his expenditure. As out of his expenditure he spends 10% on medicine. As there is an increase in the price of medicine so he has to spend more Rs. 1600 more than he used to spend on medicine. What is the percentage of total income he spends on medicine after the medicine price increased?
The ratio of frogs and crocodiles in a pond is 25 : 33 respectively. The average number of frogs and crocodiles in the pond is 261. How many frogs are there in the pond?
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: All the snakes are cats. All the cats are frogs. Some monkeys are frogs. Conclusions: I. Some frogs are snakes II. Some monkeys are cats III. All the cats are snakes
Which assumptions are implied from the below statement? Statement: Frogs are amphibians. Assumptions: I: Frogs like living underwater. II: Frogs come out of the water to eat.
In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement 1 : All dogs are wolves. Statement 2 : Some dogs are frogs. Conclusion I : Some wolves are frogs. Conclusion II : No frogs are wolves.
From the following two premises which conclusions could be validly drawn from the premises: Statement: All turtles are frogs, All frogs are amphibians. Conclusions: I. All turtles are amphibians. II. Some frogs are turtles.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Only conclusions I and II follow. Statements: Some species are fishes. All fishes are frogs. No frog is a turtle. Conclusions: I. Some frogs are fishes. II. Some species are frogs. III. Some fishes are turtles. 
The statements below are followed by two conclusions labeled I and II. Assuming that the information in the statements is true, even if it appears at variance with generally established facts, decide which conclusion(s) logically and definitely follow(s) from the information given in the statements. Statements: 1) All toads are frogs. 2) All frogs are snakes. Conclusion: I. Some snakes are toads. II. Some frogs are toads.