Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

The doctrine of Necessity has been elaborately considered in the landmark decision of

The doctrine of Necessity has been elaborately considered in the landmark decision of Correct Answer R. v. Dudley and Stephens, (1884) 14 QBD 273

Related Questions

The doctrine of Necessity has been elaborately considered in the landmark decision of:
Which of the following statements is/are correct?
1. When the court declares certain provisions of the Act as invalid and affects the validity of that Act, this principle is known as Doctrine of Severability.
2. It is the prospective character of Article 13(1) which gives rise to the Doctrine of Eclipse.
3. The American doctrine of waiver of Fundamental Rights is part of the Indian Constitution.
4. The doctrine of prospective overruling was not applied in I. C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab.
Which of the following statement is correct? Answer using given below:
(1) Doctrine of indoor management apply in case of knowledge of irregularity in company.
(2) Doctrine of indoor management does not apply in case of suspicion of irregularity.
(3) Doctrine of indoor management apply in case of forgery.
(4) Doctrine of indoor management does not apply if the act of an officer of a company is one which would ordinarily be beyond the powers of such an officer.
Matters pertaining to the validity of exercise of legislative power as distributed between the Union and the States under different lists are scrutinized with the help of which of the following principles?
1. Doctrine of Severability
2. Doctrine of Colourable Legislation
3. Doctrine of Eclipse
4. Doctrine of Pith and Substance
Select the correct answer:
It has been said that the doctrine of 'precedent' is of antiquity while the doctrine of 'stare decisis' is relatively modem.
The emergence of the doctrine of 'stare decisis' was related to:
In the following passage some of the words have been left out. Read the passage carefully and choose the correct answer for the given blank out of the four alternatives.
The nation has been _____as a relatively extensive, territorial relation of nativity. We have further formulated the_____of the nation as a territorially_____, yet bounded, social relation for the generation, transmission, and ____of life. When the nation is a national state, it is also a_____for the protection of life. The nation is often ______by the metaphor of familial relations and, indeed, has sometimes been considered as some kind of_____family. This is understandable because both the nation and the family are relations of_____. Nonetheless, there is an important difference, and to understand this will _____a more detailed examination of the_____ between territory and bonding.
and, indeed, has sometimes been considered as some kind of ______ family.
Decision in which one of the following cases has been described by the Supreme court to have attained the status of a landmark for bringing out correct tests for application of Section 300(3) of the Indian Penal Code?
Within Kantian frame work, which of the following hold(s) good?
1. Freedom of the rational will and necessity of natural causality are compatible.
2. Necessity of natural causality relates the action to its consequences, while freedom of rational will relates the agent to the choice of freedom
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: As part of an effort to address the rising cases of divorces in the country, China's Jiangsu province has introduced a voluntary 'divorce test' for couples planning to end their marriage. Couples who score above 60 may be able to save their marriage, the civil affairs bureau said. Around 34 lakh Chinese couples filed for divorce in 2017. Is this sort of a decision/ test legitimate? Arguments: I. Yes, it is a valid decision and will give couples a chance to save their relationship. II. No, if a couple has decided to end their relationship, such a test won’t be beneficial. III. Yes, there is no harm in giving the test, if they want to separate their ways they can. But there might be a ray of hope that they decide to rethink their decision.
. . . . . . . . decision is very crucial decision in one's life where he has to make careful deliberations and analysis before arriving at the final decision.