In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that "where no rent has been fixed by the controller, the landlord can receive the future rent in advance exceeding one month's rent"?

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that "where no rent has been fixed by the controller, the landlord can receive the future rent in advance exceeding one month's rent"? Correct Answer Mangat Rai v. Kedar Nath, AIR (1980) SC 1709

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.
In which one of the following cases, the Supreme Court had observed that if the Supreme Court and the High Court both were to be thought of as brothers in the administration of justice, the High Court has larger jurisdiction but the Supreme Court still remains the elder brother?