If a minor dies during the pendency of the suit

If a minor dies during the pendency of the suit Correct Answer Suit can be continued by the legal representatives of the minor

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
In a contractual dispute between two parties A and B, A files a suit in New Delhi where the cause of action arose. Two days later, B files a suit in the same matter in Mumbai, where A is resident. The pendency of the first suit is not brought to the notice of the court in Mumbai. The court pronounces judgement in second suit before the first suit is decided. Would such decision operate as a bar on the court in New Delhi to try the suit any further?
Which of the following statements are true?
(1) Minor's contract can be ratified on attaining majority.
(2) Minor's contract cannot be ratified on attaining majority.
(3) Minor's contract can be ratified jointly by both the parties to the contract.
(4) Minor is not liable under minor's contract.
(5) Minor's contract is an enforceable contract.
B' a bank, under a scheme for grant of educational loan to females, grants a loan of Rs. 2,00,000/- to 'A'. 'A' fails to repay the loan and 'B' files a suit for recovery thereof. During the pendency of suit, 'A' is married. 'B' does not take any steps within the prescribed time, to substitute the maiden name of 'A' with the married name of 'A' in the suit. The suit is decided in favour of 'B' and against 'A' in her maiden name:
Where a guardian ad litem, representing a minor defendant, files a written statement and the minor attains majority during the pendency of the suit:
In a suit for partition, a Memorandum of Family Settlement is filed and on this basis the partition suit is decreed, but even after disposal of the suit the original Memorandum of Family Settlement remains in the file of the partition suit, then in such situation whether in a suit for eviction by one of the original co-owner of a tenant of a shop of the joint property which has fallen to the share of that co-owner as per the decree passed on the Memorandum of Family Settlement, can the certified copy of the Memorandum of Family Settlement be filed and proved as a public document in the suit against the tenant?
In a suit filed by the plaintiff, the defendant in his written statement has taken the objection of non-impleadment of necessary party. Despite such objection the plaintiff continued the suit and the suit finally was decreed. At the first appellate stage, the plaintiff withdraws the suit with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and subsequently filed a fresh suit. The period spent by the plaintiff in the earlier suit, under section 14 of Limitation Act is
A' the tenant files a suit for permanent injunction against 'B' the landlord for not to be dispossessed except by due process of law pleading that 'B' is planning to forcibly dispossess him. During the pendency of above suit, 'B' attempts to forcibly disposes 'A'. 'A' files another suit for injunction.
During the pendency of an appeal by the four defendants in the suit, one of the appellants (defendants) dies and no steps for substitution of his legal representatives are taken and the appeal in so far as it relates to the said appellant abates. The five respondents (plaintiffs) apply for dismissal of the entire appeal as abated. Answer whether:
A minor enters into agreement representing himself to be major
Consider the following statements:
1. Minor commits fraud if the other party does not have personal knowledge of his age
2. Such agreement is enforceable
3. The doctrine of estoppel does not apply in minor's case
4. Other party is entitled to get back the benefit passed to minor, if innocent about his age
Which of the statements given above are correct?