If the digital signature of any subscriber is alleged to have been affixed to an electronic record, the fact that such digital signature is the digital signature of the subscriber must be proved, except in the case of a:

If the digital signature of any subscriber is alleged to have been affixed to an electronic record, the fact that such digital signature is the digital signature of the subscriber must be proved, except in the case of a: Correct Answer Secure digital signature

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

If the digital signature of any subscriber is alleged to have been affixed to an electronic record the fact that such digital signature is the digital signature of the subscriber must be proved, except in the case of a
Under Indian Evidence Act, 1872, for raising presumption in respect of an electronic record that electronic signature on the record which purports to be that of any particular person was so affixed by him the record shall be-
Electronic record in proper custody gives rise to a presumption as to the digital signature, to be affixed by the particular person under Section 90A of the Indian Evidence Act, if the electronic record produced is
Under Section 37 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, the certifying authority can suspend the digital signature certificate if
(1) The subscriber is found guilty of malpractise
(2) The subscriber is involved in cyber terrorism
(3) The subscriber requests for the same
(4) In public interest
Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code states that "whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine any document or electronic record which he knows or has reason to believe to be a forged document or electronic record, shall be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such document or electronic record".
If a person is convicted only for the offence under Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code he will then
To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
Under the Information Technology Act, when is an electronic record attributed to the originator?
1. When it is sent by the originator himself.
2. When the Information system programmed by originator sends electronic record automatically.
3. When the electronic record is sent bt a person who had authority to act on behalf of the originator.
Select the correct answer using the given below.
Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, in respect of confessional evidence
1. So much of the information as it relates distinctly to the fact discovered in consequence of information received from the person accused may be proved against him.
2. Person giving such information must be accused of an offence.
3. Accused need not be in the police custody.
4. Any statement of the accused confessing his guilt must be made in presence of a Magistrate, in all cases, whether anything is discovered or not in consequence of such statement, may be proved against him.
Fact in issue' is defined under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that includes 'any fact from which, either by itself or in connection with other facts, the existence, non existence, nature, or extent of any right, liability or disability, asserted or denied in any suit or proceeding, necessarily follows'. In a case where 'A' is accused of murder, which one of the following fact is not a fact in issue?
Proposition of the Law of Evidence is that
1. Proceedings of Legislature may be proved by the records certified by a member present in the proceedings.
2. Acts of the Central Government may be proved by the records of the department, certified by heads of the departments.
3. Acts of the state may be proved by the document purporting to be printed by the order of such Government.
4. Acts of the State Government may be proved by records of the department certified by the head of the corresponding department of the Central Government.