Related Questions

Which of the following among item A and item B are correct?
The right of private defence extends, subject to Section 99, to the causing of death of the assailant or aggressor in the following circumstances:
Item A: For defence of body:
1. Against an act which reasonably causes the apprehension of an assault to outrage the modesty
2. Against an act which reasonably causes the apprehension that the assailant will kill his children living in another city
3. Against an act which reasonably causes the apprehension that grievous hurt would otherwise be the consequence
Item B: For defence of property:
1. While the trespasser is engaged in house breaking during day time.
2. Against a thief who reasonably causes the defender to believe that he would lose his property
3. Against a person who commits mischief under such circumstances as may reasonably cause apprehension that grievous Hurt would be a consequence
Select the correct answer:
Under Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the defendant may plead his defence under the:
PRINCIPLES: 1. Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defense.
2. When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence, is not that offence, by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of that person or by reason of misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defense against that act, which he would have if that act were an offence.
3. Everyone has the right to defend their life and property against criminal harm provided it is not possible to approach public authorities and more harm than that is necessary has not been caused to avert the danger.
4. If in the exercise of right of private defense against an assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defense extends to the running of that risk.
5. The right of private defense continues as long as apprehension of danger continues.
FACT: A enters by night a house which he is legally entitled to enter. Z, in good faith, taking A for a housebreaker, attacks A.
Give correct answer by using codes given below:
The Environmental approach has led the Supreme Court to derive, adopt and apply a range of principles to guide the development of environmental jurisprudence. Notable amongst the fundamental norms recognised by the court are
1. Every person enjoys the right to a wholesome environment, which is a facet of the right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution
2. Enforcement agencies are under an obligation to strictly enforce environmental laws
3. Government agencies may not plead non-availability of funds, inadequacy of staff or other insufficiencies to justify the non-performance of their obligations under environmental laws
4. Stringent action ought to be taken against contumacious defaulters and persons who carry on industrial or development activity for profit without regard to environmental laws
Ordinarily an amendment of pleading in a suit may be carried out by the contesting parties under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908.The court may allow the amendment:
1. In case the changes carried out in the pleading do not change the relief claimed for.
2. At any stage of the suit.
3. Without imposing costs.
4. Of an application filed for interim relief.
Select the correct answer:
Defendant is in possession of 120 cotton bales as agent of the Plaintiff. Plaintiff files suit for specific performance of the contract against the defendant to compel delivery of the same. The relief claimed can be refused on the ground
"Any person entitled to any legal character, or to any right as to any property, may institute a suit___' বিধানটি The Specific Relief Act, 1877 এর কোন ধারায় বর্ণিত হয়েছে?
Which of the following statement/statements is/are incorrect?
1. Nothing is offence which is done in exercise of right of Private Defence under Indian Penal Code
2. A person has right to defend his own body only and not the body of other
3. Right of Private Defence is extended to cause death in defamation case
4. A person has even right of Private Defence where there is time to have recourse to the protection of the public authorities
h,J,K,L,M,N and O are the only legislators eligible to vote on Bills 1,2 and 3, each of which will be passed if at least four legislators eligible vote in favor of it. each legislator must vote on all three bills; on abstentions are possible. The following is known : *H must vote against all three bills; each of the other legislators must vote in favor of at least one bill and against at lest one bill. *j must vote against Bills 1. *O Must vote against Bills 2 and 3. * L must the same way that K dose on all three bills.*N must vote the same way that O dose on all three bills. If M votes the same way that O dose on all three bills, which of the following can be determined ?
X sues A and B on a promissory note executed by A, B is A's nephew, and he is joined as a defendant on the ground that A and B are member of a joint Hindu family, and that the note was for a debt binding on the family. None of the defendant appears at the hearing and an ex parte decree is passed against both the defendants.
The decree against A proceeds on the ground that the note was passed by him and against B on the ground that the debt was incurred for a family purpose. B applies for an order to set aside the decree, alleging that the summons was not served upon him and that the debt in respect of which the note was passed by A was not incurred for a family purpose. It is not disputed that the amount was actually advanced to A.