A two judge bench of the Supreme Court set aside the Jammu and Kashmir High Court's judgment which had held that various key provisions of the . . . . . . . . were outside the legislative competence of Parliament, as they interfered with Section 140 of the Transfer of Property Act of Jammu & Kashmir, 1920.

A two judge bench of the Supreme Court set aside the Jammu and Kashmir High Court's judgment which had held that various key provisions of the . . . . . . . . were outside the legislative competence of Parliament, as they interfered with Section 140 of the Transfer of Property Act of Jammu & Kashmir, 1920. Correct Answer Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.
Consider the 5 × 5 matrix \[{\text{A}} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 1&2&3&4&5 \\ 5&1&2&3&4 \\ 4&5&1&2&3 \\ 3&4&5&1&2 \\ 2&3&4&5&1 \end{array}} \right
Where two or more courts have taken cognizance of the same offence and a question arises as to which of them ought to inquire into or try the offence, the question shall be decided
1. If the courts are subordinate to the same High Court, by that High Court
2. By the High Court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the accused resides, carries on business or is engaged in a gainful employment
3. If the courts are subordinate to the same High Court, by that High Court in consultation with the State Government concerned
4. If the courts are not subordinate to the same High Court, by that court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the proceedings were first commenced
Which of the above are correct?
Which of the following statements are correct? Answer by using the code given below:
1. Persons in Govt/Judicial service need not resign to participate in District judge selection process held in "Vijay Kumar Misra and another v. High Court of Judicature at Patna" by the Supreme Court of India
2. The Supreme Court of India held in S. Kazi v. Muslim Education Society that " All Tribunals are not necessary parties to the proceedings where legality of its orders challenged"
3. The Supreme Court of India observed in Cardanumom Marketing Corporation and others v. State of Kerala and others that Social Security to the legal profession becomes an essential part of legal system
4. The Supreme Court of India held in 'Union of India v. Rajasthan High Court and others that High Court judges are exempted from Airport frisking.
Consider the following statements to answer this question.
1. Parliament cannot extend the jurisdiction and power of the Supreme Court.
2. No discussion can take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of judge of the Supreme Court in discharge of the duties.
3. A retired judge of the Supreme Court cannot appear or plead in any court or before any authority within the territory of India.
4. The salaries and allowances of the Supreme Court are fixed by the Constitution and charged on the Consolidated Fund of India.
Which of these statement are correct?
A seven member bench of the Supreme Court unanimously struck down clauses 2(d) of Article 323A and clause 3(d) of Article 323B of the Constitution relating to tribunals which excluded the jurisdiction of High Court and Supreme Court. The court held that power of judicial review over legislative action is vested in the High Court under Article 226 and in the Supreme Court under Article 32. This is an integral part of the basic structure of the constitution. Name the case:
Let A be an m × n matrix and Ban n × m matrix. It is given that determinant ($$I$$m + AB) = determinant ($$I$$n + BA), where $$I$$k is the k × k identity matrix. Using the above property, the determinant of the matrix given below is
\[\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 2&1&1&1 \\ 1&2&1&1 \\ 1&1&2&1 \\ 1&1&1&2 \end{array}} \right
Under Criminal Procedure Code where two or more courts have taken cognizance of the same offence and question arises as to which of them ought to try that offence, the question shall be decided
1. By the Supreme Court
2. If the Court are subordinate to the same High Court by that High Court
3. If the Courts are not subordinate to the same High Court, by the High Court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the proceedings were first commenced
Choose the correct answer:
Eigen values of the matrix \[\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 0&1&0&0 \\ 1&0&0&0 \\ 0&0&0&{ - 2i} \\ 0&0&{2i}&0 \end{array}} \right
Consider the following:
1. Supreme Court's power to issue writs is narrower than that of High Courts
2. A citizen is free to approach High Court or Supreme Court as he chooses, whenever his fundamental rights are violated
3. The law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts throughout India