A Metropolitan Magistrate sentenced an accused of theft for three months simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200/-. Accused can file an appeal against such judgment in:

A Metropolitan Magistrate sentenced an accused of theft for three months simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200/-. Accused can file an appeal against such judgment in: Correct Answer No appeal can be filed

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

A Magistrate convicts an accused of theft for one year imprisonment and one thousand fine. Maximum punishment for which accused can be sentenced to imprisonment in default of payment of fine shall be-
A person for offence of theft is convicted and sentenced by Judicial Magistrate First Class to one year imprisonment and fine. What is the maximum term of imprisonment which can be awarded in default of payment of fine?
The Chief Judicial Magistrate has punished the accused with imprisonment of five years and fine of ten thousand rupees under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code. The maximum imprisonment under the Section 325 is seven years. On nonpayment of fine, the Magistrate can give him maximum imprisonment upto:
A' is charged with the offence of causing simple hurt 'A' pleads guilty to the charge before the Metropolitan Magistrate and is accordingly convicted for the said offence and sentenced to imprisonment for one year. 'A' can file an appeal
A, who had undergone detention during trial, has been sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- and suffer simple imprisonment for one month in default of payment of fine. A fails to deposit the amount of the fine and is made to undergo imprisonment in default. A claims set-off. In this situation, A is . . . . . . . .
A' is arrested and detained in custody in a case of murder. The investigating police officer within 24 hours produces the accused before a Metropolitan Magistrate who has no jurisdiction to try the case, seeking police custody as investigation is not complete. The Metropolitan Magistrate has the power and jurisdiction to:
A person 'Y' is convicted for the offence of kidnapping in 1960 and sentenced to three years of imprisonment. On release from the Tihar Jail, he is apprehended and detained for commission of murder and tried and convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment in 1990. Is this a violation of Article 20 of the Constitution of India?
A' was sentenced to fine of rupees one thousand and in case of default to suffer simple imprisonment for six months. He did not pay the fine and was taken in custody. After six weeks, an amount of rupees one hundred was realised through warrant for recovery and he further deposited rupees four hundred the balance remaining unpaid. 'A' would be
Where the High Court has, on appeal, reversed an order of acquittal of an accused person and convicted him and sentenced him to death or to imprisonment for life or to imprisonment for a term of ten years or more
Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, in respect of confessional evidence
1. So much of the information as it relates distinctly to the fact discovered in consequence of information received from the person accused may be proved against him.
2. Person giving such information must be accused of an offence.
3. Accused need not be in the police custody.
4. Any statement of the accused confessing his guilt must be made in presence of a Magistrate, in all cases, whether anything is discovered or not in consequence of such statement, may be proved against him.