Find out the Wrong Match:
1. Section 200 ⇔ Examination of Complainant
2. Section 313 ⇔ Examination of Accused
3. Section 53 ⇔ Examination of Accused by Doctor
4. Section 54 ⇔ Examination of Victim

Find out the Wrong Match:
1. Section 200 ⇔ Examination of Complainant
2. Section 313 ⇔ Examination of Accused
3. Section 53 ⇔ Examination of Accused by Doctor
4. Section 54 ⇔ Examination of Victim Correct Answer 4 only

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

After a storm the rescue team is searching for injured people. A nurse on the team discovers a victim lying next to a broken natural gas line. The victim is not breathing and is bleeding heavily from a leg wound. How should the nurse proceed? Place care in order of their priority. 1. Take the victim’s vital signs. 2. Start rescue breathing immediately. 3. Apply surface pressure to the foot wound. 4. Remove the victim from the immediate vicinity. 5. Transport the victim to the hospital immediately.
A village Vaidya used to successfully operate wounds with shaving blade. Victim who was suffering from piles was operated with shaving blade by the Vaidya. Due to profound bleeding, the victim died and profound bleeding, the victim died and the Vaidya was prosecuted for causing death of the victim. If you are a defence lawyer under which of the following sections of the Indian Penal Code you can defend the Vaidya.
When examined under Section 313 Criminal Procedure Code, a circumstance incriminating the accused is not put to the accused for the explanation. The said circumstances cannot be used against the accused because:
Which of the following statements is/are correct?
All evidence taken in the course of the trial or other proceeding must be taken in the presence of the
1. Accused only.
2. Accused and his pleader.
3. Pleader of the accused, when the attendance of the accused is dispensed with.
4. Accused, except as otherwise provided under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Select the correct answer:
Each material circumstance appearing in evidence against the accused must be put to the accused specifically, distinctly and separately. In this context, the propositions are
1. Failure to put the material evidence to the accused always vitiates the trial
2. Failure to put the material evidence amounts to a serious irregularity which can not be cured and vitiates the trial, if it has prejudiced the accused.
3. Failure to put the material evidence is not considered to services & is curable if infact no failure of justice has occasioned to the accused.
Now which of the following is correct
The Domestic Violence Act, 2005 provides for which of the following?
1. Seeks to ensure civil remedy to the victim.
2. No protection is provided to the victim.
3. Woman can claim right to her 'stridhan'.
4. A woman loses right to reside with her husband.
5. State provides protection officers for victim.
In an examination 30,000 candidates appeared from Gujarat, Exam is in three languages Hindi, English, Gujarati and (before starting examination candidate choose individual language and in between examination changing language is allowed), 53% of candidates complete the exam in English, 61% of candidate in Hindi, 60% of candidate in Gujarati, 24% of candidates complete examination in English and Hindi both, 27% of candidates complete examination in English and Gujarati both, 35% of candidates complete examination Hindi and Gujarati both. Find how many candidates complete the examination in single language?
Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, in respect of confessional evidence
1. So much of the information as it relates distinctly to the fact discovered in consequence of information received from the person accused may be proved against him.
2. Person giving such information must be accused of an offence.
3. Accused need not be in the police custody.
4. Any statement of the accused confessing his guilt must be made in presence of a Magistrate, in all cases, whether anything is discovered or not in consequence of such statement, may be proved against him.
The accused found the deceased engaged in sexual intercourse with his 15 year old daughter. The accused assaulted the deceased on the head with a spade which resulted in death. Accused claimed private defence. The prosecution led evidence to show the sexual intercourse was with consent. Here accused
A' and 'B' have been accused of an offence where the accused persons had no intention of causing the death of any one and no injury was found on the deceased which was sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. As per medical opinion, the injuries were not likely to cause death. It could not be established as to which of the two accused inflicted injuries on the head of the deceased. The accused should be liable to be convicted under: