In which of the following cases the Supreme Court has upheld the validity of Section 51 of Code of Civil Procedure?

Which of the following statements are correct in the context of Section 5 of Code of Civil Procedure?
1. Revenue Court is a part of Civil Court
2. Civil Court. means courts having original jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure but not Revenue Court
3. Civil Court means courts having original jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure including Revenue Court
4. Revenue Court is not a part of Civil Court

A

1 and 2

B

2 and 3

C

2 and 4

D

3 and 4

E

None of these

Which of the following pairs is/are correctly matched?
1. Right to file caveat Section 148-A, Code of Civil Procedure
2. Pauper suit Section 33, Code of Civil Procedure
3. Privileged document Section 29, Code of Civil Procedure
4. Powers of appellate court Section 102, Code of Civil Procedure

A

1 only

B

4 only

C

1 and 2

D

2, 3 and 4

Which of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Judgement and decree ⇔ Section 34, Code of Civil Procedure
2. Costs ⇔ Section 35, Code of Civil Procedure
3. Institution of suits ⇔ Section 26, Code of Civil Procedure
4. Legal representative ⇔ Section 50, Code of Civil Procedure
Select correct answer:

A

2, 3 and 4

B

1, 2 and 3

C

1, 3 and 4

D

1, 2 and 4

Which of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Temporary ⇔ Order 39 Code of Civil Procedure injunction
2. Suit by Indigent ⇔ Order 33 Code of Civil Procedure person
3. Powers of Appellate ⇔ Section 102 Code of Civil Procedure Hate Court
4. Right to file ⇔ Section 148A Code of Civil Procedure caveat
Select correct answer:

A

1, 2 and 4

B

1, 2 and 3

C

1, 3 and 4

D

2, 3 and 4

Which of the following combinations are correctly matched-
1. Equity of ⇔ Section 49 Code of Civil Procedure judgement debtor
2. Privileged ⇔ Section 29 Code of Civil Procedure documents
3. Legal ⇔ Section 50 Code of Civil Procedure representative
4. Pauper suit ⇔ Order 33 Code of Civil Procedure
Select correct answer:

A

1, 2 and 3

B

1, 2 and 4

C

2, 3 and 4

D

1, 3 and 4

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.

A

Since the relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court, the five-judge bench's decision is not 'law' within the meaning of Article 141, and is not binding on the high court

B

The Supreme Court must expressly declare that its judgment is binding on all courts within the territory of India when passing judgment. In this case, the Supreme Court has not done so, and therefore, the decision of the five-judge bench is not binding on the high court

C

The High Court cannot ignore the decision of the Supreme Court on the ground that relevant provisions of law were not brought to its notice. Under Article 141, it is bound by the decision of the Supreme Court

D

Only those decisions that are passed by a larger bench than the five-judge bench would be hinding on the high court, since legitimate doubts have been raised about the propriety of the five-judge bench's decision

E

The decision of the five-judge bench, since it is in conflict with other decisions, must first be decided upon by a larger bench on the Supreme Court. Only after that would the decision be binding on all other courts under Article 141 of the Constitution

Which of the following statements are correct? Answer by using the code given below:
1. Persons in Govt/Judicial service need not resign to participate in District judge selection process held in "Vijay Kumar Misra and another v. High Court of Judicature at Patna" by the Supreme Court of India
2. The Supreme Court of India held in S. Kazi v. Muslim Education Society that " All Tribunals are not necessary parties to the proceedings where legality of its orders challenged"
3. The Supreme Court of India observed in Cardanumom Marketing Corporation and others v. State of Kerala and others that Social Security to the legal profession becomes an essential part of legal system
4. The Supreme Court of India held in 'Union of India v. Rajasthan High Court and others that High Court judges are exempted from Airport frisking.

A

Only 2 is correct

B

1, 2 and 3 are correct

C

2, 3 and 4 are correct

D

1, 2 and 4 are correct

Reading the amended Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the insertions of O. 10, which of the following conditions should be satisfied before matter could be referred to an Alternate Dispute Redressal?
1. Existence of elements of settlement in the opinion of the Court
2. The parties must share the opinion of the court
3. Formulation of the terms of settlement by the court
4. The court should invite the observation of the parties on the terms of settlement
5. Observations of the parties must be received by the court
6. If need be, reformulate the terms of settlement and refer the same for Alternate Dispute Redressal contemplated un section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure

A

2, 3

B

1, 4

C

1, 5, 6

D

All of these

Which of the following combinations are not correctly matched?
1. Execution of decree ? Sec. 77, Code of Civil Procedure
2. Letter of request ? Sec. 82, Code of Civil Procedure
3. Legal representative ? Sec. 50, Code of Civil Procedure
4. Institution of suit ? Sec. 28, Code of Civil Procedure
Select the correct answer:

A

1, 2 and 3

B

1, 2 and 4

C

1, 3 and 4

D

2, 3 and 4

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Section 377 of Indian Penal Code?

A

National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India

B

Charu Khurana v. Union of India

C

Jaya Bachhan v. Union of India

D

Suresh Kumar Kaushal v. Naz Foundation

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court has upheld the validity of Section 51 of Code of Civil Procedure?

Related Questions