Consider the following statements:
Abetment is constituted by
1. Instigating a person to commit an offence.
2. Engaging in a conspiracy to commit it.
3. Intentionally aiding a person to commit it.
Which of the statements given above are correct?

Consider the following statements:
Abetment is constituted by
1. Instigating a person to commit an offence.
2. Engaging in a conspiracy to commit it.
3. Intentionally aiding a person to commit it.
Which of the statements given above are correct? Correct Answer 1, 2 and 3

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

Which of the following statements are correct in relation to criminal conspiracy?
1. When two or more persons agree to do an unlawful act by an unlawful means then they will be guilty of criminal conspiracy
2. Several persons agreed to commit an "offence" but nothing was done in pursuance of the agreement
3. When two or more persons agree to do a lawful act in lawful manner by lawful means but an overt act is done by one them
4. Criminal conspiracy to commit and offence punishable with fine alone will not entail any liability
Select the correct answer:
A' is committing robbery, 'B' is attempting to commit robbery, 'C' is present and aiding 'A' in robbery, while 'D' and 'E' are present and aiding 'B' in attempting to commit robbery. If all of them are conjointly doing this, then:
Consider the following statements:
1. A person is not guilty of dacoity unless he has committed, attempted to commit or aided in committing robbery.
2. When two persons conjointly commit robbery, every person so committing robbery is said to commit robbery.
Of the above statements
The offence of criminal conspiracy lies not in doing the act of effecting the purposes for which the conspiracy is formed but in the forming of the scheme between the parties. A criminal conspiracy consists of:
Consider the following statements in respect of criminal conspiracy:
1. There has to be always an agreement to commit an offence
2. The agreement must be between two or more persons
3. Unlawful means always be used
4. The agreement may be for any act prohibited by the law
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
To prove both the parts of the offence contemplated in Section 116 of the Indian Penal Code, which of the following must be proved by the prosecution?
1. To prove the first part, the accused did abet the offence either by instigation or by conspiracy or by intentional aiding or by illegal omission.
2. To prove the first part, the offence was such which is punishable with imprisonment.
3. To prove the second part, the person abetted was a public servant during the period he was abetted.
4. To prove the second part, it was the duty of such public servant to prevent the commission of such an offence.
Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy other than a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable is dealt under-
Consider the following statements:
A person abets the doing of a thing, who
1. Instigates any person to do that thing.
2. Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Which of the following statements relating to the tort of conspiracy is/are correct?
1. It consists of an agreement.
2. It consists of forming a combination with the purpose of causing damage.
3. Damage suffered by the plaintiff must be proved.
4. The gist of conspiracy in tort is an agreement alone.
Select the correct answer using the given below:
Consider the following set of legal propositions:
1. A person can claim damages for all wrongs he has suffered.
2. A person can claim damages for wrongs only if they are caused intentionally.
3. A person can claim damages for a wrong if it is caused by infringement of this legal right.
4. A person can claim damage even if he has suffered no loss.
Of the above propositions: