Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Which of the following is an essential ingredient of an offence under Section 129, Indian Penal Code? Which of the following is an essential ingredien t of an offence under Section 129, Indian Penal Code?
1. The accused is a public servant (or was a public servant at the time of commission of the offence)
2. He was having custody of a prisoner of state or custody of a war prisoner
3. Such a prisoner was rescued or escaped
4. Such an escape or rescue was due to the negligence of the accused

Which of the following is an essential ingredient of an offence under Section 129, Indian Penal Code? Which of the following is an essential ingredien t of an offence under Section 129, Indian Penal Code?
1. The accused is a public servant (or was a public servant at the time of commission of the offence)
2. He was having custody of a prisoner of state or custody of a war prisoner
3. Such a prisoner was rescued or escaped
4. Such an escape or rescue was due to the negligence of the accused Correct Answer 1, 2, 3, 4

Related Questions

Which of the following ingredient is to be proved of an offence under Section 128, Indian Penal Code by the prosecution?
1. The accused is a public servant
2. That a State prisoner or prisoner of war is confined in a place
3. That such accused (public servant) has in his custody such State prisoner or prisoner of war
4. That the accused public servant has voluntarily allowed a prisoner to escape from the place of confinement
Consider the following statements:
1. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires two persons whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code require five persons.
2. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires common intention, whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code requires common object
3. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code both require presence of a prior consent
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Both create specific offence
Which of the above statements are correct?
Carefully read following statements:
1. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of two persons, whereas under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of five persons.
2. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, common intention is required whereas under Section 149 Indian Penal Code, common object is required
3. Previous consent is required under Section 34 & 149 of Indian Penal Code
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code constitutes a specific offence
Which of the above statements is true:
To prove both the parts of the offence contemplated in Section 116 of the Indian Penal Code, which of the following must be proved by the prosecution?
1. To prove the first part, the accused did abet the offence either by instigation or by conspiracy or by intentional aiding or by illegal omission.
2. To prove the first part, the offence was such which is punishable with imprisonment.
3. To prove the second part, the person abetted was a public servant during the period he was abetted.
4. To prove the second part, it was the duty of such public servant to prevent the commission of such an offence.
In the question below, a statement is given which is followed by three assumptions numbered I, II and III. An assumption is something that is supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement. Statement: After more than two weeks, all 12 boys and their coach, stuck in the flooded Tham Luang Cave have been rescued by the Thai navy seal team. The last three members of the 'Wild boar' football team and their coach were rescued today ending a three-day rescue attempt that had caught the world's attention. Assumptions: I. The ‘Wild Boars' soccer team and their coach got trapped when they set out to explore the vast cave complex after soccer practice when a rainy season downpour flooded the tunnels. II. Four more of the boys were carried on stretchers out of the labyrinthine Tham Luang cave on the Myanmar border at dusk on Monday, bringing to eight the number brought out after two rescue pushes on successive days. III. The rescuers have been learning from experience and were two hours faster in bringing the second batch of survivors out on Monday. 
A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement? Statement: Elon Musk donated submarine pods to rescue the boys stuck in the cave 3 days before they were rescued. Inferences: I. The boys were rescued using the pods donated by Elon Musk II. The pods influenced more people to help in terms of technology/ideas which helped in the eventual rescue.
A ship developed a leak 15 km from the shore and yet could travel towards the shore at a speed of 10 km/hr for a maximum time of 18 min. A rescue vessel that was immediately sent from the shore to rescue the passengers would take 6 min to complete the rescue once it reaches the ship. What should be the minimum speed of the rescue vessel in order to be able to successfully evacuate everyone onboard the ship?
Consider the following statements:
1. A public servant accepted gratification to show favour to a person.
2. A person expecting to become a public servant accepted gratification to show favour.
3. A person not expecting to be in office accepted gratification to show favour.
Which of the above amount to an offence by a public servant u/s 161 Indian Penal Code?
1. A Judicial Magistrate First Class can authorize the detention in custody, of a person accused of an offence triable by Special Court established under The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, for a period not exceeding fifteen years.
2. The Special Court established under The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, cannot exercise the power to authorize the detention of accused in custody, as enunciated under Section 167 of Code of Criminal Procedure.
3. The definition of 'use' under Section 2(xxviii-a) of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, excludes personal consumption of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances.
4. The High Court, by special order, may constitute as many Special Courts under The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, as necessary.
Which of the above statements are correct?
Which of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Harbour ⇔ Section 51A, Indian Penal Code
2. Wrongful Loss ⇔ Section 23, Indian Penal Code
3. Gang rape on woman under twelve years of age ⇔ Section 376DB, Indian Penal Code
4. Gang rape ⇔ Section 376D, Indian Penal Code
Select the correct answer: