The Supreme Court has ruled that a person belonging to a non-reserved class transplanted by adoption or marriage or conversion or any other voluntary act to a family belonging to reserved class does not become eligible to the benefit of reservation either under Article 15(4) or 16(4) of the constitution in:

The Supreme Court has ruled that a person belonging to a non-reserved class transplanted by adoption or marriage or conversion or any other voluntary act to a family belonging to reserved class does not become eligible to the benefit of reservation either under Article 15(4) or 16(4) of the constitution in: Correct Answer Kumari Madhuri Patel v. Additional Commissioner Tribal Development

Related Questions

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.