Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Which of the following statements are true in context of a company under Company Act, 2013?
1. The shareholders of a company can appoint Board of Directors.
2. The Board of Directors is the proper authority to convene Annual General Meeting.
3. The gap between two annual general meetings must not be more than fifteen months.

Which of the following statements are true in context of a company under Company Act, 2013?
1. The shareholders of a company can appoint Board of Directors.
2. The Board of Directors is the proper authority to convene Annual General Meeting.
3. The gap between two annual general meetings must not be more than fifteen months. Correct Answer 1, 2 and 3

Related Questions

Which of the following statements are true in case of appointment of directors?
1. A company can appoint maximum fifteen directors.
2. A company may appoint more than fifteen directors after passing a special resolution in general meeting.
3. The approval of Central Government is not required in case some enhancement is done in case of directors.
In the question below, a statement is given followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested course of action logically follow (s) for pursuing. Statement: Tesla and its CEO Elon Musk have agreed to pay a total of $40 million and make a series of concessions to settle a government lawsuit alleging Musk duped investors with misleading statements about a proposed buyout of the company. The settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission allows Musk to remain CEO of the electric car company but requires him to relinquish his role as chairman for at least three years.  Courses of action: I. Tesla must hire an independent chairman to oversee the company, something that should please a number of shareholders who have criticised Tesla's board for being too beholden to Musk.  II. The deal could remove one cloud that hangs over Tesla. Investors fretted about the company's ability to cope without Musk, a charismatic entrepreneur whose penchant for coming up with revolutionary ideas has drawn comparisons to one of Silicon Valley's most revered visionaries, Apple co-founder Steve Jobs.  III. Besides paying a fine and stripping Musk of his chairman's title, Tesla also must appoint two more directors who have no ties to the company or its management. Musk will be allowed to remain on the board.
In the question below, a passage is given followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Passage: The board of Vedanta Ltd Limited on Monday approved a proposal for delisting of the company and will seek shareholders approval for the process through e-Voting, the company informed the exchanges. The company has proposed to buy 48.9% shares at Rs 87.5 apiece whereas the book value of the company is around Rs. 141 per share. Retail investors hold 7% of the total shares whereas Institutional Investors hold 41.9% of the total shares. Minimum 90% of shareholders should approve the de-listing for it to happen. The scrip closed today at Rs.110, down 4% from the previous close. Courses of action: I. Vedanta must cajole Institutional shareholders to approve the de-listing. II. Institutional Investors must seek a better deal from the company and vote out this proposal as it is below both the market price and book value. III. Retail investors must come together and complain to the exchanges regarding the company’s attempt to force them out of their shares.
Which of the following statements are true in context of a company under Company Act, 2013?
1. A company can become a member of another company
2. Member's voluntary winding up takes place when the company is insolvent
3. Only board of director can convene Extraordinary General Meeting
The conditions regarding selection from a list of suitable candidates to be called for interview after a written examination for appointment of management-level persons to a multi-national company providing accounting services and sales are mentioned below. Candidates: a) Must have a Bachelor's degree in Basic Science with 65% or more marks or BE with 55% or more marks. b) Must have passed the examination with 70% or more marks. c) Age must be between 25 to 30 years as of 1/4/18. d) Must have 3 years of experience in an Accounting Institution and must have a Diploma in Accounting with 60% or more marks. e) Must be currently getting CTC of Rs. 6 lakh or more per annum. If the candidate: 1) If he fulfills all the other conditions other than A above, he will be designated as Junior Accountant. 2) If he fulfills all the other conditions other than (d) and (e) above, he can be designated as Trainee-Accountant. If he fulfills all the above conditions including 5 years of experience, he can be designated as a Senior Accountant. He can be designated as Manager (Accounts) if he fulfills all the above criteria including educational qualifications of CA/ ICWA/ MBA (Finance). Study all the above information and answer the following question. Varun has passed the CA exam and has a bachelor's degree in basic science and a diploma in accountancy, having scored 75% or more in the written examination during his entire career and also in the written examination. His age is 27 years and with 4 years of experience in Accountancy, he has a CTC salary of 18 lakhs per annum. To which of the following positions can he be referred? Select from the given options.
Which of the following statements are true in context of a company under Company Act, 2013?
1. A member of a company must be a shareholder of a company.
2. Proxies are not to be included while counting the quorum of a meeting of a company.
3. The maximum number of directors in a public as well as private company is 15.
4. In case of a private company, there is no restriction to transfer the shares.
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner? Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments.  II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year.  III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.
Two statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some musicians are writers. All writers are directors. Conclusions: I. All musicians are directors. II. Some musicians are not directors.
Two statements are followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has sought information on offshore investments by directors of RNT Associates, a closely held firm which functions as a family office and investment vehicle of Ratan Tata.  II. The ED order, dated June 14, also calls for details of investments or loans from RNT Associates and its directors to a Singapore-based entity, RNT Associates Ltd. Conclusions: The order is under provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and the documents are being sought for the purpose of investigation under FEMA. The nature of queries from Enforcement Directorate is related to RNT Associates’ investment portfolio. It is compliant with all disclosures and existing laws governing investments and is extending all cooperation.
Consider the given statement to be true and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the information given in the statement. Statement: Government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions. Conclusions: 1. The government should appoint Directors of the financial institutions taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance. 2. The Directors of the financial institutions should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.