Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

In the following question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: I. Some glasses are plastics. II. No glass is metal. Conclusions: I. Some plastics are metal. II. Some plastics are glasses.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and select which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some plastics are wool. Some wools are papers. Conclusions: 1. Some plastics are papers 2. Some papers are plastics
In this question, three statements are given followed by two conclusions. Choose the conclusion(s) which best fit(s) logically. Statements: 1) Some soccer are shoes. 2) Some shoes are covers. 3) All covers are plastics. Conclusions: I. Some plastics are shoes. II. Some soccer are plastics.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some handkerchiefs are plastics. All clothes are handkerchiefs. All utensils are clothes. Conclusions: I. Some plastics are handkerchiefs. II. All utensils are plastics. III. Some handkerchiefs are utensils.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should plastics be banned completely? Arguments: I. Yes. All the types of plastic are non-biodegradable. II. No. Some plastics can be recycled and used again. A complete ban is not necessary.  
Consider the following processing methods for plastics: 1. Transfer moulding 2. Extrusion 3. Thermoforming 4. Calendering Which of these are best suited for processing of plastics to their final shape?
In the following question, sentences of a paragraph have been jumbled and labelled as A, B, C and D. You are required to rearrange the jumbled sentences of the paragraph and mark your response accordingly by selecting the correct option. A: Plastics that act as pollutants are categorized into micro-, meso-, or macro debris, based on size. B: They are inexpensive and durable, and as a result, levels of plastic production by humans are high. C: However, the chemical structure of most plastics renders them resistant to many natural processes of degradation and as a result, they are slow to degrade. D: Plastic pollution is the accumulation of plastic objects and particles (e.g. plastic bottles, bags, and microbeads) in the Earth's environment that adversely affects wildlife, wildlife habitat, and humans.
Two statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered 1 and 2. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All dustbins are plastics. All geysers are plastics. Conclusions: I. Some geysers are dustbins. II. No geyser is a dustbin.
In the question, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: No plastics are polymers. Statement II: Some rubbers are plastics. Conclusion I: Some polymers are rubbers. Conclusion II: All rubbers are polymers.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All woods are chairs. All chairs are benches. All plastics are woods. Conclusions: I. All woods are benches. II. All plastics are chairs. III. No bench is a plastic.