Related Questions

Which of the following is not a true consent as described in Section 90, Indian Penal Code?
1. By a person under the fear of injury
2. By a person under a misconception
3. By a person of sound mind
4. By a person who is intoxicated
5. By a person who is under twelve years of age
Extortion is . . . . . . . . if the offender at the time of committing an extortion, is in the presence of the person put in fear, and commits the extortion by putting that person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt or of instant wrongful restraint to that person or to some other person, and, by so putting in fear, induces the person to put in fear then and there to deliver up the thing extorted.
The propositions are
1. The general property in goods can be with one person while the special property in the same goods be with the another person.
2. The transfer of general property in goods to one person can be done subject to a special property in the same goods in another person.
3. The special property in goods can be only with the person having general property in goods.
In respect of the aftersaid proposition which of the following is true
There are eight boxes of chocolates, each box containing distinct number of chocolates from 1 to 8. In how many ways four of these boxes can be given to four persons (one boxes to each) such that the first person gets more chocolates than each of the three, the second person gets more chocolates than the third as well as the fourth persons and the third person gets more chocolates than fourth person?
Read the following information carefully and answer the questions that follow: Seven persons Tina, Vini, Yasir, Rishi, Sanya, Pankaj and Urmila live on the separate floors of a 7- floor building. Ground floor is number one; second floor is number two and so on. Each of them goes to a city viz. Paris, Istanbul, Shanghai, Durban, London, Madrid and Dubai but not necessarily in the same order. Only three people live above the floor on which Sanya lives. Only one person lives between Sanya and the one who goes to Paris. Vini lives just below the person who goes to Madrid. Only three people live between the one who goes to Paris and London. The person who goes to Madrid lives on an even numbered floor. Urmila lives just above Rishi. Urmila does not go to London. Only two persons live between Pankaj and the one who goes to Durban. Pankaj lives above the person who goes to Durban. Yasir does not go to Istanbul. Tina does not live just above or just below Sanya. The one who goes to Shanghai does not live just above or just below Pankaj. Who among the following lives on floornumber 7?
In the 1966 Supreme Court decision Miranda v. Arizona, the court held that before the police can obtain statements from a person subjected to an interrogation, the person must be given a Miranda warning. This warning means that a person must be told that he or she has the right to remain silent during the police interrogation. Violation of this right means that any statement that the person makes is not admissible in a court hearing.
This paragraph best supports the statement that
Based on survey, it was found that the probability that person like to watch serials is 0.25 and the probability that person like to watch netflix series is 0.43. Also the probability that person like to watch serials and netflix sereis is 0.12. what is the probability that a person doesn't like to watch either?
Consider the following set of legal propositions:
1. A person can claim damages for all wrongs he has suffered.
2. A person can claim damages for wrongs only if they are caused intentionally.
3. A person can claim damages for a wrong if it is caused by infringement of this legal right.
4. A person can claim damage even if he has suffered no loss.
Of the above propositions:
There are 50 boxes and 50 persons. Person 1 keeps 1 marble in every box, person 2 keeps 2 marbles in every 2nd box, person 3 keeps 3 marbles in every third box. The process goes on till person 50 keeps 50 marbles in the 50th box. Find the total number of marbles kept in the 50th box.
PRINCIPLES: 1. Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defense.
2. When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence, is not that offence, by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of that person or by reason of misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defense against that act, which he would have if that act were an offence.
3. Everyone has the right to defend their life and property against criminal harm provided it is not possible to approach public authorities and more harm than that is necessary has not been caused to avert the danger.
4. If in the exercise of right of private defense against an assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defense extends to the running of that risk.
5. The right of private defense continues as long as apprehension of danger continues.
FACT: A enters by night a house which he is legally entitled to enter. Z, in good faith, taking A for a housebreaker, attacks A.