Related Questions

Section 2(d) of Indian Contract Act says: "When, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing; or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or abstain from doing, something, such act or abstinence or . . . . . . . . is called a consideration for the promise."
When, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing or, does or abstains from doing or promises to do or to abstain from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise under section 2(d) is called
Even though a man's knowledge that a particular consequence will probably result from his act is sometimes an insufficient basis for saying that he intends it, there are strong reasons for holding that as a legal matter he can be held to intend something that he knows for sure he is doing. This is called
Doing or saying something morally right stands for ----
In the following question the 1st and the last part of the sentence/passage are numbered 1 and 6. The rest of the sentence/ passage is split into fourparts and named P, Q, R and S. These four parts are not given in their proper order. Read the sentence/passage and find out which of the four combinations iscorrect. 1. First Deserve and then Desire.
P. Earlier I was very ambitious and wanted to fulfil my desires by hook or by crook.
Q. One can be exposed any time and put to shame.
R. This saying proved to be a mantra for success in my life.
S. But I realised that success through short cuts is short-lived.
6. I followed this saying and today I am a successful businessman.
I will kill you' is an example of which one of the following speech Acts according to Austin?
According to Austin the positive law has following three attributes:
Which of the following requirements form an essential element of 'course of employment' in cases of vicarious liability?
The servant's act must be:
1. Expressly or impliedly authorised by the master
2. Unauthorised manner of doing something which is authorised by the master.
3. Done to protect the interest of the master
4. Necessarily incidental to something which the servant is employed to do.
5. Done for the benefit of the master.
Select the correct answer using the given below:
To invoke the defence of insanity, which of the following must be clearly proved at the time of committing the act?
1. The accused was labouring under defect of reason
2. From disease of the mind
3. Does not know the nature and quality of the act he was doing
4. If he did know, he did not know what he was doing was wrong
X' a boy of eleven years stabbed his father thrice as he saw that his two elder brother stabbed the father one after the other he ran away. On being questioned, 'X' justified his act saying that his two elder brothers would not have stabbed the father unless he had done "something wrong" and hence deserved to be killed. What is the criminal liability of 'X' in the case?