Which section of the Limitation Act prescribes that in computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal or application, for leave to appeal or for revision or for review of a judgment, the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced and the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the decree, sentence or order appealed from or sought to be revised or reviewed shall be excluded:

Which section of the Limitation Act prescribes that in computing the period of limitation any suit, appeal or application, for leave to appeal or for revision or for review of a judgment the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced and the time requisite obtaining a copy of the decree, sentence or order appealed from or sought to be revised reviewed shall be excluded:

A

Section 11

B

Section 12

C

Section 13

D

Section 14

Statement A - In computing period of limitation for any appeal, the day from which such period is to be reckoned, shall be included.
Statement B - In computing period of limitation for any appeal, the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced and the time requisite for obtaining the copy of the decree shall be excluded.

A

Statement A is correct

B

Statement B is correct

C

Both are correct

D

Both are incorrect

Statement A: In computing period of limitation for any appeal, the day from which such period is to be reckoned, shall be included.
Statement B: In computing period of Limitation for any appeal, the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced and the time requisite for obtaining the copy of the decree shall be excluded.

A

Statement A is correct

B

Statement B is correct

C

Both are correct

D

Both are incorrect

Under which section of the Limitation Act, 1963 the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the decree or order appealed shall be excluded in computing the period of limitation for appeal, review or revision?

A

Section 12(2)

B

Section 12(1)

C

Section 12(3)

D

Section 12(4)

E

None of these

Assertion (A): Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit appeal or application a period of limitation different from period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of Section 3 of Limitation Act, 1963 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the schedule.
Reason (R): Where a Special Law prescribes a period of limitation for filing appeal but there is no provision therefore under Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation provided under the Special Law must be treated to be different from that under the Limitation Act.

A

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is correct explanation of (A)

B

Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not correct explanation of (A)

C

(A) is true but (R) is false

D

(A) is false but (R) is true

In which section it is provided that, in computing the period of limitation for appeal, review or revision, the time requisite for obtaining copy of the decree or order appealed shall be excluded under

A

Section 12(a)

B

Section 12(b)

C

Section 13(c)

D

Section 14(d)

In computing the period of limitation for appeal, review or revision, the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the decree or order appealed shall be excluded under

A

Section 12(1)

B

Section 12(2)

C

Section 13(3)

D

Section 14(4)

In computing the period of limitation for an appeal, a review or revision, the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the decree or the order appealed against shall be excluded under

A

Section 11(a)

B

Section 12(2)

C

Section 13(3)

D

Section 14(4)

In computing under Section 12, Limitation Act, 1963, the time requisite for obtaining a copy of a decree or an order, any time taken by the court to prepare the decree or order before an application for a copy thereof is made . . . . . . . .

A

Shall be excluded

B

Shall not be excluded

C

Either (A) or (B)

D

None of these

To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition

A

1, 2

B

3, 4

C

2, 4, 5

D

All of these

Related Questions