Statements : Some boxes are hammers. Some hammers are beads. All beads are rings.

Conclusions :
I. Some rings are hammers.
II. Some hammers are boxes.
III. Some rings are boxes.

Statements : Some boxes are hammers. Some hammers are beads. All beads are rings.

Conclusions :
I. Some rings are hammers.
II. Some hammers are boxes.
III. Some rings are boxes. Correct Answer Only I and II follow

II is the converse of first premise and so it holds.

Some boxes are hammers. Some hammers are beads.

Since both the premises are particular, no definite conclusion can be drawn.

Some hammers are beads. All beads are rings.

Since one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some hammers are rings'. I is the converse of this conclusion and so it holds.

Some boxes are hammers. Some hammers are rings.

Since both the premises are particular, no definite conclusion can be drawn.
Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

Statements : Some pots are keys. Some keys are locks. All keys are rings.

Conclusions :
I. Some pots are locks.
II. Some pots are not locks.
III. Some pots are rings.
IV. Some pots are not rings.
Statements : All needles are threads. All threads are boxes. All trees are boxes.

Conclusions :
I. No needle is tree.
II. Some trees are threads.
III. Some boxes are needles.
IV. Some trees are needles.