Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

A person 'Y' is convicted for the offence of kidnapping in 1960 and sentenced to three years of imprisonment. On release from the Tihar Jail, he is apprehended and detained for commission of murder and tried and convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment in 1990. Is this a violation of Article 20 of the Constitution of India?
Atif is charged with the murder of Khuda Baksh on the 21st January, 1882. In fact, the murdered person's name was Haidar Baksh, and the date of the murder was the 20th January, 1882. Atif was never charged with any murder but one, and had heard the inquiry before the Magistrate, which referred exclusively to the case of Haidar Baksh. What will the Court infer from this while applying Section 215 Criminal Procedure Code?
A is accused of a child's murder. The following facts are constructed in the case:
1. An hour before the murder, A went to the place of murder with the child.
2. A alone returned home.
3. Collar of A's shirt found to be blood-stained.
The evidence which takes into account the above-mentioned facts is called:
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should all the criminal convicted for committing murder be awarded capital punishment ? Arguments : I. Yes, this will be a significant step towards reducing cases of murder in future. II. No, nobody has the right to take any person's life irrespective the acts of such individuals.
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement : Should all the criminal convicted for committing murder be awarded capital punishment ?
Arguments :I. Yes, this will be a significant step towards reducing cases of murder in future.II. No, nobody has the right to take any person's life irrespective the acts of such individuals.
A' who is a citizen of India commits murder in Uganda. He is arrested in Delhi. He can be tried and convicted of murder-
In the question below are given two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II, and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Only a few Crimes are Murder Some Deaths are not Crime Conclusions: I. Some Crimes are not Death II. Some Crimes are not Murder III. Some Murder being Death is a possibility
Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer :

Statement : To investigate the murder of the lone resident of a flat, the police interrogated the domestic servant, the watchman of the multi-storeyed buildings and the liftman.

Assumptions :
I. The domestic servant, watchman and the liftman can give a clue about the suspected murder.
II. Generally in such cases the persons known to the resident are directly or indirectly involved in the murder.
X is charge for murder of Y. About a month before the murder Y had attempted to rape the wife of X, X has an altercation with Y immediately before murder X is:
What is the printout of the following switch statement? char ch = 'a'; switch (ch){ case 'a': case 'A': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'b': case 'B': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'c': case 'C': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'd': case 'D': System.out.print(ch); }