Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

A Nurse moved 90 m in the East in a hospital to look for her duty Doctor, then she turned right and went 20 m. After this she turned right and after going 30 m she reached I.C.U. but the Doctor was not there. From there she went 100 m to her north and met her doctor. What distance did she move to meet her duty doctor from the starting point.
Four friends A, B, C, and D, who are from different families, meet at a party. One of them is the doctor  A says, " B is a doctor". B says, "I am a doctor." C says, "D lies." D says, "B lies." If only one of them is laying, then find out who the doctor is.
Four friends A, B, C and D meet at their alumni get-together. One of them is a doctor whereas the other three are engineers. A says, ‘C is an engineer’. B says, ‘Neither A nor D is the doctor’. C says, ‘I am not the doctor’. D says, ‘C is telling the truth’. If all four of them are speaking the truth, then identify who is the doctor?
In the following question, three statements are given followed by three conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) the given statements. Statements: I. Only man is principal. II. Few man are doctor. III. Some doctor are woman. Conclusions: I. All woman being man is a possibility. II. All man being doctor is a possibility. III. Some doctor can be principal.
S1:An elderly lady suddenly became blind.
P :The doctor called daily and every time he took away some of her furniture he liked.
Q :At last she was cured and the doctor demanded his fee.
R :She agreed to pay a large fee to the doctor who would cure her.
S :On being refused, the doctor wanted to know the reason.
S6:The lady said that she had not been properly cured because she could not see all his furniture.

The Proper sequence should be:
Statement A: When a court of Sessions passes a sentence of death, the court shall, according to Rule 102of the General Rules (Criminal) 1980, commit the prisoner by a warrant in the appropriate form to the jail from which he came to stand his trial, and shall submit its proceedings to the High Court at the latest on the fourth day after the sentence of death has been pronounced.
Statement B: When a court of Sessions passes a sentence against a female prisoner to death, according to Rule 104 of the General Rules (Criminal) 1980, it shall consider after enquiring from such prisoner herself, if necessary, whether she is pregnant and if it thinks that it is likely, it shall have her examined by the District Medical Officer or such other doctor as it may consider fit and if it finds that she is in fact pregnant, it shall make a report to the High Court.
Four brothers R, S, M and G are at their annual family property fight sitting across a circular table. Their occupations are -  author, biologist, chemist and doctor, but not necessarily in that order. G starts by setting the agenda of the meeting and after him the doctor gives a long discourse of what is right and what is wrong. R is sitting across the doctor and next to the chemist. M is silent throughout the meeting and the chemist speaks only at the very end. The profession of R is:
The passage consists of six sentences. The first and sixth sentences (S1 and S6) are given. The middle four sentences (P, Q, R, S) are given in jumbled order. Find out the proper order for the four sentences. S1: Most people who have come close to death say they remember nothing. P. It may permanently change a person’s perceptions of what is real and important Q. The near-death experience is among the most powerful experiences that a person can have. R. That ‘something’ might be a near-death experience. S. However, a third or more may later report that ‘something happened.’ S6: However, one extraordinary aspect of near-death experience is that a person’s culture, religion, race or education does not affect the pattern of the experience.
Read this statement and state which of the following arguments is/are stronger. Statement: The Central Government should abolish the death penalty in India. Conclusions: I. The removal of the death penalty forever will increase the courage of premeditated and heinous offenders to indulge in such crimes again and again. Therefore, instead of removing the death penalty completely, the use of it in selective and special circumstances is stronger. II. The death penalty itself is equivalent to the state taking life in itself, which is considered a heinous crime. Therefore it should be eliminated.
PRINCIPLE: 1. A person is liable for death penalty when he does an act which is likely to cause death, and that person knows that his act in all probability will only result in death.
2. Death penalty is given only in rarest of rare cases.
FACT: Sunita, a married woman was flogged out of her husband's house by her father-in-law. When she was living with her parents, she got involved with a widower who also had an affair with Anita. In a fit of jealousy, Sunita killed her rival, Anita, as well as her little baby. Sunita also disfigured the faces of Anita and her baby and buried the bodies. Later, Sunita was tried for murder.