Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

whom did they accuse?

whom did they accuse? Correct Answer who was accused by them ?

Related Questions

Whom did they accuse? choose the right passive voice.
Change the voice: "Whom did they accuse"
Whom did they accuse? The passive form of this sentence is :
Study the following information and select guilty person. Ram was visiting a place where inhabitants always answer any question with two sentences. One of these is always true while other is always false. While on the visit he found that his bag has been stolen and he suspected three persons those visited his guest room. He was sure that only one person is guilty. When he questioned them they replied as follows. R ∶ S did not do it. I did not do it. S ∶ I did not do it. P did not do it. T ∶ I did not do it. I did not know who did it.
'Whom did she accuse?' Choose the right passive voice.
The gypsys are a tribe of strange people. They do not have any fixed home but wander about from place to place and live in tents. they were originally natives of India. But as they reached England from Egypt ,the English took them from Egyptians. this is why they came to be called gypsys. they were beloved to possess strange powers. they could tell your fortune by reading the palm of your hand. it was thought they stole little children to train them in their way of life. whenever a child got lost it was thought that it has been carried away by gypsys so they were arrested and sent for trial. but this attitude towards the Gypsy has gradually changed.The gypsies are people who ---
In a town fair 50 people were asked which dessert they liked: ice cream, Donuts, or cupcakes. 28 said they like ice cream, 26 said they like donuts, and 26 said they like cupcakes. 8 said they like all three. 17 said they like donuts and cupcakes, 11 said they like ice cream and cupcakes. 5 said they do not like any of these. Find those people who liked ice cream and donuts but not cupcakes.
In the following question, sentences of a paragraph have been jumbled and labelled as P, Q, R and S. You are required to rearrange the jumbled sentences of the paragraph and mark your response accordingly by selecting the correct option. P: They are defects, not in the heart, but in the brain; for they take place in the stoutest natures; as in the example of Henry the Seventh of England. Q: Certainly they are to be repressed, or at least well guarded: for they cloud the mind; they lease friends; and they hinder in business, whereby business cannot go on currently and constantly. R: Suspicions amongst thoughts are like bats amongst birds, they ever fly by twilight. S: They dispose of kings to tyranny, husbands to jealousy, wise men to irresolution and melancholy.
Given below are four jumbled sentences. Pick the option that gives their correct order. No matter how small a role they played, they are very much significant today as they were in those times. After all, they are the ones because of whom we celebrate Independence Day. Moreover, they revolted against the colonizers to stand up for the country and its people. One cannot emphasize enough on the importance of freedom fighters.
Read the passage and answer the questions that follow. Unsurprisingly, the latest conviction comes a month after the FATF, a global dirty money watchdog, urged Pakistan to complete an internationally agreed action plan to fight terror financing. In February 2018, Pakistan endorsed a UN list of terrorist organizations operating in the country and enforced a nationwide ban on them, including the LeT and the JuD, just before a meeting of the FATF. But the FATF still placed Pakistan on its “grey list” in June 2018, and demanded more actions from Islamabad to avoid being blacklisted, which could invite economic sanctions. Ever since, Pakistan, which cannot afford to be blacklisted, especially when its economy is in shambles, has moved against Saeed. The Anti-Terrorism Department’s FIRs against Saeed and his aides accuse the JuD of financing terrorism from its fund collections in the name of charity through NGOs. While the authorities’ move against Saeed is welcome, the question is whether these are genuine attempts to fight terrorism or half-hearted measures to dodge international pressure. There are doubts because Pakistan had used anti-India and anti-Afghan terrorist networks for strategic advantages. It was this dual policy of fighting terror at home while nurturing terror groups that target its rivals abroad that has been responsible for Pakistan’s predicament. If it is serious about fighting terrorism, Pakistan should crackdown on terror financing and terror infrastructure. The international community and organizations, including the FATF, should keep up the pressure until Islamabad shows tangible outcomes. According to the passage, why FATF did not remove Pakistan from the "grey list"?