Match the best alternative that corresponds to the quotation word or phrase in the sentences : If the client insists upon being 'stubborn' lawyers have to settle claims in court.

Select the phrase/connector (it must be at the start) from the given three options which can be used to form a single sentence from the two sentences given below, implying the same meaning as expressed in the statement sentences. Groups began to settle on the land. Appropriate political institutions and commercial production began to evolve. (i) When groups began to settle… (ii) As groups began to settle… (iii) With groups beginning to settle on…

A

Only (i) is correct

B

Only (ii) is correct

C

Only (iii) is correct

D

Both (i) and (iii) are correct

E

All are correct

Two statements are given followed by two conclusions I, II, III and IV. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem at variance from commonly known facts. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follow/s from the given statement. Statements: 1. All judges are lawyers. 2. Some lawyers are seniors. Conclusions: I. Some seniors are judges. II. Some seniors are lawyers. III. Some lawyers are judges. IV. Some judges are seniors.

A

Only conclusions I and II follow

B

Only conclusions I and IV follow

C

Only conclusions III and IV follow

D

Only conclusions II and III follow

Given below the three statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Decide which of the conclusion(s) follow/s from the statements. Statements: 1. All lawyers are professionals. 2. Some lawyers are intelligent. 3. No intelligent man is prosperous. Conclusion: I. At least some lawyers are prosperous is a possibility. II. All lawyers, if they are intelligent, are also prosperous.

A

Conclusions I and II both follow.

B

Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follow.

C

Only conclusion II follows.

D

Only conclusion I follows.

Given below are two premises a) and b). Four conclusions are drawn from them. Select the code that states validly drawn conclusion(s). [Taking the premises individually or jointly] Premises: a) All judges are lawyers. b) No doctors are lawyers. Conclusions: i) No lawyers are doctors. ii) No doctors are judges. iii) All lawyers are judges. iv) Some doctors are judges.

A

i and iii

B

i and ii

C

i and iv

D

ii and iii

Among the following statements, two are contradictory to each other. Select the code that represents them: Statements: (a) All judges are lawyers. (b) Some judges are lawyers. (c) Some judges are not lawyers. (d) No judges are lawyers.

A

(a) and (b)

B

(a) and (c)

C

(a) and (d)

D

(b) and (c)

Given below are two premises with four conclusions drawn from them (taking, singly or together). Which conclusions are validly drawn? Select the correct answer from the code given below. Premises: (i) All lawyers are extroverts. (ii) Some wisemen are extroverts. Conclusions: (a) All lawyers are wisemen. (b) All wisemen are lawyers. (c) Some extroverts are wisemen. (d) All extroverts are lawyers.

A

(b) and (c) only

B

(a) only

C

(c) only

D

(a) and (c) only

E-commerce marketplace operator Groupon has agreed to settle patent infringement claims with IBM for $57 million and to license patents from the software company in the future. Which of the following explains the given statement? I: IBM has sued e-commerce marketplace operator Groupon for $57 million citing patent infringement. II: Both the companies have agreed to settle patent infringement claims for $57 million. III: Groupon has agreed with IBM to license patents from the software company in the future.

A

Only I

B

Only II and III

C

Only I and II

D

Only I and III

E

All of these

On account of an agitation the lawyers ceased to participate in court proceedings and resorted to 'Satyagrah' An editorial in a newspaper criticised as to whether it behooves to the lawyers as a class to resort to strike. The lawyers were interalia described as 'Kajia dalal' i.e. dispute broker, in the editorial:

A

Editor of the newspaper is guilty of offence of defamation

B

Editor of the newspaper is not guilty of offence of defamation

C

Not only editor, but Chairman of Board of Directors and its General Manager are also guilty of defamation

D

None of the above

In the question two statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement 1: Some doctors are engineers. Statement 2: All engineers are lawyers. Conclusion I: Some lawyers are doctors. Conclusion II: All lawyers are engineers. Conclusion III: Some engineers are doctors.

A

Only conclusion I follows

B

Both Conclusion I and III follows

C

All conclusions I, II and III follows

D

Both Conclusion II and III follows

Match the best alternative that corresponds to the quotation word or phrase in the sentences : Library cards will 'expire' when they are not used.

A

cost more money

B

cease to be effective

C

be mailed to the owner's address

D

be renewed automatically

Match the best alternative that corresponds to the quotation word or phrase in the sentences : If the client insists upon being 'stubborn' lawyers have to settle claims in court.

Related Questions