Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Each question below is followed by two statements I and II. You have to determine whether the data given in the statements are sufficient for answering the question. You should use the data and your knowledge of Mathematics to choose the best possible answer. A train started from a point P towards Q and met with an accident after traveling 30 km, the speed of train got reduced after the accident and finally reached the destination 16 min late, then what is distance covered between P and Q? I. The train would have reached 21 min late had the accident happened 10 km after P. II. The train would have reached 12 min late had the accident happened 20 km before Q
In the following sentence, a part of the sentence is underlined. Below are given alternatives to the underlined part, which may improve the sentence. Choose the correct alternative in case no improvement is needed, choose the alternative that indicates ''No Improvement.'' A bike accident was this morning that killed two people.  A. There was a bike accident    B. A bike accident was there  C. A bike was there in the accident
Consider three software items: Program-X, Control Flow Diagram of Program-Y and Control Flow Diagram of Program-Z as shown below Program-X: Control Flow Diagram of Program-Y sumcal (int maxint, int value) {       int result=0, i=0;       if (value <0)       {           Value = -value;       }       while ( (i
Amar went to Rishikesh for rafting. He faced an accident and his boat got punctured, so he called for help. Hearing this, a lifesaver who can row 24 km/h in still water left the tent to rescue Amar and it took him 1 hour to row to the accident site and come back. If the river is running at 3.6 km/h, how far is the accident site from the tent.
A research has shown that most people, who witness an accident, do not help the victims of the accident. People refused to help the victims as they did not want to get involved in long court procedures. There needs to be a change in the laws regarding the people who witness accidents and also help accident victims. The statements above, if true, best support which of the following assertions?
In the following question, the 1st and the last part of the sentence/passage are numbered 1 and 6. The rest of the sentence/ passage is split into four parts and named P, Q, R and S. These four parts are not given in their proper order. Read the sentence/ passage and find out which of the four combinations is correct. 1. My sister and I were in a bad car accident. P. My sister is Mrs. Popular at school – she knows everyone. Q. I, on the other hand, am a bit of an introvert – I hang-out with the same 2 girls all the time. R. And while all her friends were commenting, my 2 friends showed up independently at the scene of the accident. S. My sister immediately posted a comment on Facebook about our accident. 6. Even before the paramedics arrived.
A truck drove 40 km starting at 9 pm and met with an accident at 11 pm, due to which It reduced its speed by 50% and reached the destination in 9 hours after the accident. Find the time taken by truck to reach the destination starting at 9 pm if the accident had not occurred.
The Supreme Court laid down in . . . . . . . . that where the enterprise is engaged in hazardous or inherently dangerous activities and harm result to anyone on account of accident, the enterprise is strictly liable to compensate all those who are affected by such accident?
Consider the given statement and decide which of the given assumptions is (are) implicit in the statement. Statement: The factory owner has decided to compensate Rs. 1 lakh to the people who met with an accident in the factory. Assumptions: I: The factory owner is capable of paying the money to the people who met with an accident. II: There might be a reduction in the number of accidents in the factory.
In the questions below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Statement: Many people died in the recent train accident. Conclusions: I. The train arrived late to the platform. II. There were many who witnessed that train accident.