Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

For large farms to be as productive as they can be, their owners need to invest heavily in expensive machinery. This typically requires them to go into considerable debt, and interest on this debt is then a significant fixed cost. This high fixed cost makes those farmers vulnerable to operating losses if the price of their products drop.

For large farms to be as productive as they can be, their owners need to invest heavily in expensive machinery. This typically requires them to go into considerable debt, and interest on this debt is then a significant fixed cost. This high fixed cost makes those farmers vulnerable to operating losses if the price of their products drop. Correct Answer They can be highly productive without being profitable.

Monetary বা মুদ্রানীতির মাধ্যমে সরকার মুদ্রা সরবরাহ বাড়িয়ে বা কমিয়ে সামষ্টিক অর্থনীতিতে প্রভাব সৃষ্টির প্রয়াস চালায়। আর বাংলাদেশ ব্যাংক এ Policy ঘোষণা করে বছরে দুই বার।

Related Questions

Read the following passage carefully and choose the most appropriate answer to the question out of the four alternatives.
Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal that does notaccord with the requirements of the free market. A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter (for that matter: so far as that isconcerned), established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious. Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to thinkof price-fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both "normal" and having a valuable economic function. In fact, price-fixing is normalin all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixingthat it requires. Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence, a comparatively small number of large firms will be competingfor the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for morethan its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-market economic theories. But each large firm will also act with fullconsideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers. Who, according to the economists, are the right group of people to set the price of a commodity?
Read the following passage carefully and choose the most appropriate answer to the question out of the four alternatives.
Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal that does notaccord with the requirements of the free market. A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter (for that matter: so far as that isconcerned), established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious. Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to thinkof price-fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both "normal" and having a valuable economic function. In fact, price-fixing is normalin all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixingthat it requires. Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence, a comparatively small number of large firms will be competingfor the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for morethan its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-market economic theories. But each large firm will also act with fullconsideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers. Price-fixing is a phenomenon that is normal in -
Read the following passage carefully and choose the most appropriate answer to the question out of the four alternatives.
Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal that does notaccord with the requirements of the free market. A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter (for that matter: so far as that isconcerned), established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious. Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to thinkof price-fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both "normal" and having a valuable economic function. In fact, price-fixing is normalin all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixingthat it requires. Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence, a comparatively small number of large firms will be competingfor the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for morethan its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-market economic theories. But each large firm will also act with fullconsideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers. A major act of will will bring about price-fixing that will be seen as -
Read the following passage carefully and choose the most appropriate answer to the question out of the four alternatives.
Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal that does notaccord with the requirements of the free market. A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter (for that matter: so far as that isconcerned), established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious. Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to thinkof price-fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both "normal" and having a valuable economic function. In fact, price-fixing is normalin all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixingthat it requires. Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence, a comparatively small number of large firms will be competingfor the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for morethan its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-market economic theories. But each large firm will also act with fullconsideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers. Selling a commodity at a price that is not more than that charged by competitors is -
Read the following passage carefully and choose the most appropriate answer to the question out of the four alternatives.
Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal that does notaccord with the requirements of the free market. A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter (for that matter: so far as that isconcerned), established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious. Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to thinkof price-fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both "normal" and having a valuable economic function. In fact, price-fixing is normalin all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixingthat it requires. Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence, a comparatively small number of large firms will be competingfor the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for morethan its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-market economic theories. But each large firm will also act with fullconsideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers.
What does not seem as not good or normal in the context of this essay?
Read the given passage and answer the question that question that follow. Not all farmers in India can afford to buy pesticides and fertilizers for their crops and so the Government gives a subsidy on pesticides and fertilizers to all the Indian farmers. Due to this, rich farmers also get the benefits of subsidies even when they do not need them. It is still imperative that subsidies be given to the farmers because withdrawing subsidies would mean handicapping the poor farmers. Which of the following argument could be made from the above passage?
In this question, a statement is given followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. You have to take the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given sequence of action is to be taken logically. Statement: Farmers are unable to sell their products due to low demand. Course of action: I: The government should buy products from farmers at a price below the cost price and export them at a higher price. II: Government should not interfere in this situation as it will cause trouble to the farmers.
Given below are four jumbled sentences. Out of the given options pick the one that gives their correct order. A. So, in the agrarian era, you destroy your enemy’s productive capacity by burning his crops or fields. B. Now, in the information era, destroying the enemy’s productive capacity means destroying their information infrastructure. C. You battle with your enemy by destroying the enemy’s productive capacity, which will be different depending upon the foundation of economy. D. But in the industrial era, ending productive capacity meant bombing of the factories that are located in cities and main industrial areas.
Statement : A large number of students are reported to be dropping out of school in villages as their parents want their children to help them in farms.

Courses of Action :
I. The government should immediately launch a programme to create awareness among the farmers about the value of education.
II. The government should offer incentives to those farmers whose children remain in schools.
III. Education should be made compulsory for all children up to the age of 14 and their employment banned.
Priya and khushi invested Rs.3000 together. Priya invested her amount at compound interest for ‘x/10’ years at x% rate interest and khushi invested half of her amount at compound interest and remaining half at simple interest at the same rate of interest for the same time period. [It is given that ‘x/10’ is a natural number] What is the value of ‘x’? Statement I: Ratio of investment of priya and khushi is 1 : 2 respectively and total sum received by them together after a particular time at x% rate of interest is Rs. 4280. Statement II: Simple interest received by khushi is Rs. 40 less than compound interest received by her. Statement III: Sum of simple interest and compound interest received by khushi after a certain time at x% rate of interest is Rs. 2500 Which of the above statement is redundant to find the answer of the given question?