Many more people who smoke develop lung cancer than do those who do not smoke. In the face of this evidence, how could a cigarette company representative argue against the conclusion that cigarette smoking cause lung cancer? To answer to the question, the representative could most likely say that

A Many things might cause cancer.
B A single cause may be reponsible for both smoking and cancer.
C People have the right to endanger themselves if they choose to do so.
D People may breathe die, but no one accuses breathing of causing death.

Correct Answer: Many things might cause cancer.

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

Testifying before the parliament committee investigating charges that cigarette manufactures had manipulated nicotine levels in cigarettes in order consumers to their products, tobacco executives argued that cigarette smoking is not addictive. The primary reason they gave in support of this claim was that cigarette smoking not regulated by the Drug Administration. For the tobacco executives ' argument to be logically correct, which of the following must be assumed?
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm the others as a result of taking risks.As a result,they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt. Which of the following, if true,most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above ?
If oone begins to smoke at an early age. It is likely that he will go on smoking further.
We should stop smoking, What "smoking" is?
What are the major pollutants of cigarette smoke?
While standing, compared to the upper part of the lung, the lower portion of the lung has
Compared to obstructive lung disease restrictive lung disease has lower
A case of restrictive lung disease is similar to a case of obstructive lung disease in having lower

Next steps