Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

'Appeal is a continuation of a suit.' — এই বিধানটি The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 এর কোন ধারার বিশ্লেষণে অনুমিত?

'Appeal is a continuation of a suit.' — এই বিধানটি The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 এর কোন ধারার বিশ্লেষণে অনুমিত? Correct Answer ৯৬

Related Questions

To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
Which of the following statements are correct in the context of Section 5 of Code of Civil Procedure?
1. Revenue Court is a part of Civil Court
2. Civil Court. means courts having original jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure but not Revenue Court
3. Civil Court means courts having original jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure including Revenue Court
4. Revenue Court is not a part of Civil Court
Which of the following combinations are correctly matched-
1. Equity of ⇔ Section 49 Code of Civil Procedure judgement debtor
2. Privileged ⇔ Section 29 Code of Civil Procedure documents
3. Legal ⇔ Section 50 Code of Civil Procedure representative
4. Pauper suit ⇔ Order 33 Code of Civil Procedure
Select correct answer:
Which of the following pairs is/are correctly matched?
1. Right to file caveat Section 148-A, Code of Civil Procedure
2. Pauper suit Section 33, Code of Civil Procedure
3. Privileged document Section 29, Code of Civil Procedure
4. Powers of appellate court Section 102, Code of Civil Procedure
Which of the following combinations are not correctly matched?
1. Execution of decree ? Sec. 77, Code of Civil Procedure
2. Letter of request ? Sec. 82, Code of Civil Procedure
3. Legal representative ? Sec. 50, Code of Civil Procedure
4. Institution of suit ? Sec. 28, Code of Civil Procedure
Select the correct answer:
Which of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Temporary ⇔ Order 39 Code of Civil Procedure injunction
2. Suit by Indigent ⇔ Order 33 Code of Civil Procedure person
3. Powers of Appellate ⇔ Section 102 Code of Civil Procedure Hate Court
4. Right to file ⇔ Section 148A Code of Civil Procedure caveat
Select correct answer:
Which of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Judgement and decree ⇔ Section 34, Code of Civil Procedure
2. Costs ⇔ Section 35, Code of Civil Procedure
3. Institution of suits ⇔ Section 26, Code of Civil Procedure
4. Legal representative ⇔ Section 50, Code of Civil Procedure
Select correct answer:
Which among the following statements regarding filing Rejoinder/Replication in a suit, as per the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, are correct?
1. Rejoinder/ Replication is filed as a matter of Right
2. Provision of filing Rejoinder/ Replication is contained under Order VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure
3. Rejoinder/Replication may be filed only after due permission of the Court.
4. Rejoinder/Replication is a part of pleading.
Select the correct answer:
সোলে ডিক্রির বিরুদ্ধে আপিল চলে না, বিধানটি The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 এর কোন ধারায় রয়েছে?
In a suit for partition, a Memorandum of Family Settlement is filed and on this basis the partition suit is decreed, but even after disposal of the suit the original Memorandum of Family Settlement remains in the file of the partition suit, then in such situation whether in a suit for eviction by one of the original co-owner of a tenant of a shop of the joint property which has fallen to the share of that co-owner as per the decree passed on the Memorandum of Family Settlement, can the certified copy of the Memorandum of Family Settlement be filed and proved as a public document in the suit against the tenant?