Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

The argument in the passage would be most seriously weakened if it were true that

The argument in the passage would be most seriously weakened if it were true that Correct Answer Domestic production of illegal drugs increased considerably in 2007

-

Related Questions

The critical reasoning question is based on a short argument, a set of statements, or a plan of action. For each question, select the best answer of the choices given and explain why the chosen answer is the right fit. Question: The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?
The Indian rupee for the first time weakened past the 73 mark against the US dollar after the crude oil prices surged to nearly $85 per barrel. INR is currently the worst performing Asian currency as India imports nearly 80% of its fuel needs. Which of the following is not-in-line with the above statement? I: The crude oil prices surged to nearly $85 per barrel. II: The Indian rupee for the first time weakened past the 73 mark against the US dollar. III: India exports nearly 80% of its fuel needs.
There is a hint in this question and a statement is given later. Carefully read the excerpts provided and determine the statement based on that episode. The current Australian team has lost three of their last five Test series. They lost their last two Test series, one of which was against Pakistan, which is not considered to be a strong team now. Australia's two best batsman, Steve Smith and David Warner are currently suspended and their absence has weakened the Australian team. There is a lot of dissatisfaction and introspection about how their national team plays in Australia, how they show aggression on the field, how they do not show respect to the team against them, and neglecting the media at the most, and focusing only on winning only, the discussion on the future of the game is ongoing. There are. Australian cricket never reached such a low level. This is the best opportunity to knock them into their own house. In other words, if this India could not beat Australia in Australia in this series, then it would prove that the campaign around this team is only the same: the propaganda. Legislation: The current Australian team won two of the last five Tests they played. Choose the right one from the next option A - The statement is completely true. B - Statement is most true. C - There is no definitive definition based on C-statement. D- Statement is completely false.
There is a hint in this question and a statement is given later. Carefully read the excerpts provided and determine the statement based on that episode. The current Australian team has lost three of their last five Test series. They lost their last two Test series, one of which was against Pakistan, which is not considered to be a strong team now. Australia's two best batsman, Steve Smith and David Warner are currently suspended and their absence has weakened the Australian team. There is a lot of dissatisfaction and introspection about how their national team plays in Australia, how they show aggression on the field, how they do not show respect to the team against them, and neglecting the media at the most, and focusing only on winning only, the discussion on the future of the game is ongoing. There are. Australian cricket never reached such a low level. This is the best opportunity to knock them into their own house. In other words, if this India could not beat Australia in Australia in this series, then it would prove that the campaign around this team is only the same: the propaganda. Statement: India has a good chance of defeating Australia. Choose the right one from the next option A - The statement is completely true. B - statement is most true. There is no definitive definition based on C-statement. D-statement is completely false.
Read the given passage and answer the question that question that follow. Water is considered as one of the basic necessities of life. Privatising water would improve its distribution but it will subsequently make its distribution profit centric and as a result, it  would lead to a rise in its price. This increase in price would make it unaffordable for many people. Distribution of water should be done by the Government as only then it would be done to benefit the public and not for profits.  Which of the following argument could be made from the above passage?
All mortals are men. Socrates is mortal Therefore Socrates is a man. Which of the following statements are true of the above argument? (A) Above arguments is sound. (B) Above argument is valid. (C) Above argument is fallacious. (D) Above argument commits the fallacy of undistributed middle. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
which one of the following is not correct?
1. If one of the premises is invalid, the argument is not true
2. An argument cannot be sound if one of the premise is false
3. If premises entail the conclusion then the argument will be valid
4. A deductive argument may be valid without being sound
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Statement: Should women serve in combat units? Arguments: I. Yes, allowing women to serve in combat units is a positive step towards gender equality. II. No, women are the most emotional gender in India Give answer: (A) If only argument I is strong (B) If only argument II is strong (C) If either I or II is strong (D) If neither I nor II is strong and
In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the privatization of every government bank be promoted? Argument 1: Yes. That would reduce the administrative burden on the government. Argument 2: No. That would weaken the financial condition of government banks.
Question: In the question, a statement is given followed by two arguments, numbered 1 and 2. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should admissions to higher educational institutions be compulsorily based on merit? Argument 1: No. This would be unfair to the weaker students. Argument 2: Yes. This would improve the quality of work put in by students.