Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Who wrote the Nobel " Roots" ?

Who wrote the Nobel " Roots" ? Correct Answer Alex Halery

1977 সালে পুলিৎজার পুরস্কার জয়ী Alex Haley রচিত বিখ্যাত উপন্যাস “Roots” এর প্রচ্ছদ।

Related Questions

Given below are two statements, followed by four conclusions. Assume the facts in the statements to be true and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All roots are fruits. All fruits are guns. Conclusions: I. All roots are guns,. II. All guns are roots. III. All fruits are roots. IV. Some guns are roots.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All woods are roots. All fruits are roots. No woods are a fruit. Conclusion: (I) Some roots are fruits. (II) All roots are woods.
Nobel Prize is announced at an international level which is administered by the Nobel Foundation in Stockholm, Sweden. Recently Nobel Prize winners for the r 2020 were announced. The recipients of the Nobel Prize 2020 are (1) Reinhard Genzel and Andreas Ghez for the discovery of supermassive compact object at the center of our galaxy, (2) Gerard Mourou and Donna Strickland for their method of generating high-intensity, ultra-short optical pulses. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
The 2018 Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded in laser physics for the optical tweezers and their applications to biological systems for the method of generating high-intensity, ultra-short optical pulses. Which of the following verifies the given statement? I:  The 2018 Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded in laser physics for the optical tweezers. II: The 2018 Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded for applications of the optical tweezers to biological systems. III: The 2018 Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded for the method of generating high-intensity, ultra-short optical pulses using the optical tweezers.
Given below are two statements followed by conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statements. Statements: I. Some flowers are fruits. II. All fruits are roots. Conclusions: I. All roots are fruits. II. Some roots are flowers.
In the formation of Routh-Hurwitz array for a polynomial, all the elements of a row have zero values. This premature termination of the array indicates the presence of 1. a pair of real roots with opposite sign 2. complex conjugate roots on the imaginary axis 3. a pair of complex conjugate roots with opposite real parts Which of the above statements are correct?
Three statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I, II  Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with the commonly known facts, decide which of the following conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: I. Some woods are roots. II. All fruits are roots III. No wood is fruit Conclusions: I. Some roots are fruits. II. No fruit is wood
Below a word is given in three sentences. Find out which one/ones make/makes a correct usage of the given word and mark the option accordingly. If the sentences are all correct mark option 5 as the answer. A: We were discussing the roots of the current economic malaise. B: Economic degradation roots in illiteracy.  C: The high crime rate has its roots in unemployment and poverty.
Given two quadratic equations, I. x2 - 31x + 240 = 0 Equation I has two roots x1, x2. (x1 > x2) II. 3y2 – 7y – 3 = 8y - 3y2 - 9 Equation II has two roots y1, y2. (y2 > y1) Find the equation whose roots are (– 2y1 + x1), - (y2 – x2).
Consider the following statements in respect of the roots of the equation x3 - 8 = 0: 1. The roots are non-collinear. 2. The roots lie on a circle of unit radius. Which of the above statements is/are correct?