[Improve the following bracket part of the sentence keeping the meaning unchanged] The move comes against the readiness of foreign baby food brands as many chinese shun local dairy products tainted by milk scandals.

[Improve the following bracket part of the sentence keeping the meaning unchanged] The move comes against the readiness of foreign baby food brands as many chinese shun local dairy products tainted by milk scandals. Correct Answer in the midst of rising popularity of

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: As a trade war looms, one of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s biggest weapons could be boycotts of American brands by his country’s legion of consumers. But Xi would also be risking collateral damage at home, The China operations of all-American brands ranging from Coca-Cola Co. and McDonald’s Corp. to Walt Disney Co. are co-owned by state-backed Chinese firms.  Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner? Arguments: I. One of Coke’s main China partners is government-backed COFCO Corp., Shanghai Disneyland is part owned by a local consortium, and McDonald’s franchisee in the country is controlled by state-backed conglomerate Citic Ltd. and private-equity firm Citic Capital Holdings.  II. Even when Chinese companies don’t have direct ownership links with U.S. brands, boycotts or other non-tariff retaliation would hit the local partners of those American companies. III. The number of big clean wins in terms of striking against the other guy (American brands) - without accidentally punching your own guy (Chinese firms) in the face - is extremely large.
Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Milk supply in Maharashtra was badly hit after thousands of dairy farmers launched a protest on Monday, demanding better price and subsidy of Rs 5 per litre. Tankers supplying milk to major cities including Mumbai, Pune, Nagpur, Nashik and others were blocked early morning leading to sudden crisis.  II. The agriculture ministry had mooted a proposal asking railways to make milk available at railway stations and at the meeting, sources said representatives from Amul India suggested that the national transporter could provide stalls to dairy companies or cooperatives where they could sell their products.  Conclusions: I. Representatives of Amul India and food safety body FSSAI are willing to discuss issues and concerns of the dairy sector in the backdrop of the farmers agitation in Maharashtra that had led to severe shortage of milk in the state.  II. The farmers' groups and Maharashtra Kisan Sabha, are demanding a GST waiver on butter and milk powder apart from the subsidy. III. Railways is drawing up a plan to make milk available at railway stations across the country to promote its consumption.
In the question below, a statement and three assumptions numbered I, II and III are given. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the following assumption and decide which of the assumption is implicit in the statement. Statement: Online grocery firm Grofers today said it is entering the FMCG segment and is targeting an overall revenue of Rs 2,500 crore by FY19. Grofers closed FY 18 with Rs 950 crore of sales and is targeting for a stronger growth trajectory in 2019, with a 50 per cent contribution from its private brands. The company has launched seven new brands under two categories Budget and Popular G-Brands.  Assumptions: I. With this, Grofers private labels expands to 250 food and non-food products for its consumers. With this significant business expansion, Grofers aims to drive the next wave of growth for e-commerce sector by bringing the next 100 million customers to its platform. II. This vertical expansion is key to drive Grofers next phase of growth in India. In the last five years, we have received an overwhelming response from our customers. III. Through many industry-first initiatives, Grofers has been instrumental in bringing new customers to the e-commerce fold with increase of its customer base. 
Indian milk market contains two types of products cow’s milk and buffalo’s milk. Commercial milk should have 80% milk. The cost of commercial milk of cow and buffalo cost Rs. 20 and Rs. 15 per liter respectively. At market both can be sold at 60% profit. A milkman who sells 70% milk as 80% and also mixes cow and buffalo in the ratio 3 ∶ 4 and sells it as cow milk. What is the profit (%) he earns?
In the question below, a passage is given followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Passage: Chinese firms like Xiaomi are facing delays in getting approvals from India’s quality control agency for their goods, as the business environment deteriorates after a clash on their Himalayan border. Chinese smartphone brands, including Oppo and Xiaomi, account for eight of every 10 smartphones sold in India. While the two companies assemble most of their models in India, several components are imported from China. Courses of action: I. Oppo and Xiaomi must be asked to ensure strict adherence to quality standards. II. Indian Public-Sector banks must be asked to give interest-free loans to Indian smartphone makers so that they could raise the capital required to compete with Chinese smartphones. III. Ways to incentivize Indian smartphone makers must be explored- Including tariffs and quotas on Chinese goods.
W, a married woman lived with her husband, along with a six month old baby, but her life was miserable as her husband frequently used to beat her. She wanted to go to her pursued but her husband threatened to beat her if she dares to do so. But one day when W was missing the husband perused her and found that she was going to her parents with the baby. When W turned around and found her husband running towards her, panic stricken she along with the baby jumped into a well. The baby died but she survived. She was prosecuted for the death of the baby. What offence if any has been committed by her?
In a shop, 5 chocolates were placed in a row in a shelf. The ‘Five star’ is to the immediate left of ‘Dairy Milk’ and to the immediate right of ‘Kitkat’. The ‘Mentos’ is to the right of ‘Dairy Milk’. ‘Snickers’ is the neighbour of ‘Dairy Milk’ and ‘Mentos’. Which chocolate is placed on the immediate right of Five star?
In the question below are given two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some dairy milk are Cadbury Some nestle are dairy milk Conclusions: I. Some nestle are cadbury II. All dairy milk are nestle III. Some cadbury are nestle
A milk seller bought certain quantity of pure milk. He first sold 20 litres of pure milk. He added 20 litres of water to the remaining quantity of milk. He then sold 20 litres of the milk water mixture and added 20 litres of water to the mixture. He again sold 20 litres of this milk water mixture and added 20 litres of water to the mixture. Now, the ratio of milk to water is 8 : 19. How much quantity of pure milk in litres did he buy in the first place?
[Improve the following bracket part of the sentence keeping the meaning unchanged] As the judge has already decided the case. further defense is useless.