A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement? Statement: The national capital has installed an automatic train wash plant intended to save water Inferences: I. The old train wash system became non-functional. II. The national capital will not face water shortage as frequently anymore.
A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement? Statement: The national capital has installed an automatic train wash plant intended to save water Inferences: I. The old train wash system became non-functional. II. The national capital will not face water shortage as frequently anymore. Correct Answer None of the inferences follow
The automatic system could have been installed despite the old system being functional and still in use. Therefore inference 1 cannot be drawn. Additionally, just because the train washing activity will now consume lesser water does not mean that this will solve the water shortage problem in the capital. Therefore this inference cannot be drawn either, making option 4 the correct answer.